A newly established science and engineering society for teenagers has sparked discussions about the appropriateness of the term "engineering" for its members. Some participants suggest using "designers" or adding qualifiers like "aspiring" or "future" to better reflect the group's status. The conversation highlights differing opinions on what constitutes an engineer, with some arguing that formal education is necessary for the title, while others believe practical experience suffices. Additionally, suggestions for enhancing the society include incorporating simple, affordable projects on their website to engage members. Overall, the initiative is praised for fostering interest in science and engineering among youth.