Can a thermocouple be used as a power cable?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using type K thermocouples as power cables to supply electricity to a camera and LED lamps. Participants explore the technical specifications of the thermocouples, including their resistance and current-carrying capacity, while considering the unconventional application of thermocouple wires for power transmission rather than temperature measurement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the specifications of the thermocouple, including its length, gauge, and resistance, and calculates potential voltage drops and power dissipation.
  • Another participant questions the appropriateness of using thermocouples for power transmission, noting the high resistance and potential voltage requirements to deliver sufficient power.
  • Concerns are raised about the thermocouple's ability to handle high voltage and current, with suggestions that the cable may not be designed for such use.
  • Some participants propose using the copper conductors of the thermocouple pairs for power transmission while reserving other pairs for low-power signals.
  • Discussion includes the possibility of using the shielding of the thermocouple as additional conductors for power delivery.
  • Participants express doubts about the practicality and safety of using thermocouples in this manner, with one suggesting that it could lead to damage or arcing at connections.
  • There is mention of the thermocouple's temperature rating, but participants remain concerned about the thermal and electrical stresses involved in this application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the viability of using thermocouples for power transmission, with multiple competing views on the potential risks and alternative approaches. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practicality and safety of this application.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainty about the voltage ratings of the thermocouple cable, the potential for overheating, and the implications of using the shielding as conductors. Participants also highlight the need for further experimentation to assess the feasibility of this approach.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring unconventional uses of thermocouples, electrical engineers considering power transmission methods, and individuals involved in experimental setups in high-temperature environments.

ECI Engingeer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find out if type K thermocouple is capable of transmitting power from an external power supply to a camera and some lamps attached on the end. I have 3 pairs of thermocouples. One pair for the camera supply. One pair for the video output. One pair for the lamps.

I have tried google for answers but have found very little useful information.

Thermocouple specs:
Length approx 75m
type K
22AWG
loop resistance 0.9368Ω/foot

Camera specs:
11.5V to 15V DC
400mA to 500mA

Video output specs:
2V p-p into 150Ω

Lamps Specs
0.5A
12V DC
LEDs

Analysis i have done so far:
Resistance of thermocouple- 246x0.9368=231Ω
Voltage drop across the thermocouple- V=IR=0.4x231=92.4V
If the current was to decrease by 10mA this would cause the voltage at the camera to decrease by 2.3V- 0.39x231=90.1V
If the resistance was to increase by 1Ω then the voltage will increase by 0.4V- 0.4x232=92.8V
At a lamp supply of 0.5A the power dissopated over the length of the thermocouple would be approx- P=IIR=0.5x0.5x231=57.75W
Equating to 0.77W/m

I look forward to your responses.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ECI Engingeer said:
I am trying to find out if type K thermocouple is capable of powering a camera and some lamps. I have 3 pairs of thermocouples. One pair for the camera supply. One pair for the video output. One pair for the lamps.

I have tried google for answers but have found very little useful information.

Thermocouple specs:
Length approx 75m
type K
22AWG
loop resistance 0.9368Ω/foot
Hi ECI Engingeer! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

I don't understand the meaning attached to length of your thermocouple. What does 75m tell us https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon5.gif
Maybe you have a thermopile? And what source of heat do you have in mind?

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermocouple#K :
Type K (chromel {90% nickel and 10% chromium}—alumel {95% nickel, 2% manganese, 2% aluminium and 1% silicon}) is the most common general purpose thermocouple with a sensitivity of approximately 41 µV/°C,[/color]
So a single thermocouple of this type at a junction temperature differential of 100°C will generate approx 0.004 volts, so I conclude you must have many more than the three pair you mention. http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/7701/questionicon.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The thermocouple cable is 75m long. Which enables us to work out the loop resistance of the cable among other things.

Sorry I didnt explain very well before earlier...
Im not concerned about the temperature differential characteristics, just with the visability of using this cable as a means of transmitting power though from an external power supply to a carmera and some LED lamps attatched at the other end. I know this is un-conventional and not the intended use for any thermocouple (hence my post). I am just looking for peoples opinions on whether it is possible or not. I suspect it would'nt work and would just end up destroying the cable.
 
Oh, now it's less mystifying. http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/9088/smilgb.gif

As you've shown, for a power cable that resistance is extraordinarily high. To deliver 12v or so to the camera you'd have to supply over 100v to the cable. That doesn't sound a very good payoff. The cable might not even be able to tolerate 100v, since such a voltage was not in its design. (I presume it is a shielded cable?) As you've pointed out, the power dissipation will be 1000s of times higher than the cable was intended to pass. What gauge is the conductor in the cable? EDIT: I see 22AWG, so it's single conductor?

Not knowing the voltage rating is a bit of a handicap. Otherwise you could rig it up to a 0-100v power source and pass current through it, slowly stepping the current up every 15 mins and noting the temp of the cable by feel. When it starts to feel warm, I'd stop. In the absence of any specs, I'd call that the limit. It's not heat resistant cable is it, intended to lead to a furnace or something?

If the cable could pass 0.5A, you could feasibly include a voltage regulator at the camera end to iron out voltage variations as current changes, so keeping the camera safe. You are envisaging constant operation, are you, passing 0.5A for hours on end?

Is there some reason for not wanting to buy more-suitable cable?

A close-up photo of the end of the cable might be informative. I don't suppose there are any part numbers on the cable, that would allow you to ask the manufacturers of its ratings?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think 22awg of copper wire is normally limited to about 0.9A so very unlikely this wire could be used.
 
Yes single conductor and shielded. I would imagine it would get very warm at 100V stage but I don't think temperature transients will be a big issue because I think k type thermocouple is rated to around 1200 degrees Celsius. I am more concerned about the risk of arcing or the damage that could be inflicted on the cable connectors. Or even damage caused by the peltier effect at the cable connections and junction boxes.

We are hoping to use the existing thermocouple cable rather than using conventional cable because the area is not easily accessible and it would be a lot more cost effective just to use the existing thermocouple. However I am doubtful this will actually happen.

Thanks for advice. I will look into setting up an experiment and the use of a voltage regulator.
 
Is the 'cold' end of the thermocouple at 'your end' of the connecting lead? This would mean that the two wires could be of different metal with very different resistance. If this is the case, then why not just use the copper (?) halves of two of the pairs to supply camera and lamps (in parallel) or even parallel up the two sides of each couple to provide two conductors of even lower resistance? The other pair could be used for the low power signal with not detriment as the signal current would be low and you could use a video amp to compensate.
This would all hang on knowing the resistances of the various combinations of conductors (individual or in pairs) but you can, presumably measure that.
 
ECI Engingeer said:
We are hoping to use the existing thermocouple cable rather than using conventional cable because the area is not easily accessible and it would be a lot more cost effective just to use the existing thermocouple.
So it's still installed in the high temp location? I assumed it was a roll of disused cable you had lying in the corner and you wanted to use it for some unrelated job to save buying more cable. :smile: So its life as a thermocouple is over?

You have "three pairs" of thermocouple cable? So that's a total of 6 solid conductor cores? Are these enclosed in 6 lengths of separate copper braid for shielding, or just 3? Does the braid form the outside cover of the cable, or is it covered in an electrical insulator?
 
Last edited:
It will ony enter high temp conditions periodically, approx 20-30 times a week for an hour max at any 1 time. The intention is to keep the functionality of the thermocouple whenever the camera equipment is not being used/connected.

In terms of shielding I believe there is just 3 pairs of shielded conductors, each incorporated into 3 larger bunches of separate cables, with elctrical insulation sheath around the outside.
 
  • #10
ECI Engingeer said:
It will ony enter high temp conditions periodically, approx 20-30 times a week for an hour max at any 1 time. The intention is to keep the functionality of the thermocouple whenever the camera equipment is not being used/connected.

In terms of shielding I believe there is just 3 pairs of shielded conductors, each incorporated into 3 larger bunches of separate cables, with elctrical insulation sheath around the outside.

Why nor use the shields as DC conductors? They are bound to have a decent cross sectional area and a pair of the shields could easily carry enough 12V power for the whole lot.
 
  • #11
ECI Engingeer said:
In terms of shielding I believe there is just 3 pairs of shielded conductors, each incorporated into 3 larger bunches of separate cables, with elctrical insulation sheath around the outside.
My thinking is that you might be able to use the shielding as the return conductor, powering the camera and LEDs with it as their common earth. That will leave you the 6 conductors to combine as you see fit for your 3 signal lines. Just would need to check that the shielding braid is substantial enough to can carry the 1A current, though it is probably bonded to the shielding of all those other cables so giving it a respectably-low impedance. As sophiecentaur pointed out, there is probably one conductor in each pair with a lower resistance, so use that to carry the 0.5A. By making low path resistances, you won't need anything like 100v to power the camera, thus no concern about voltage stress in the cables.
 
  • #12
@NascentOxygen
Snap!
 
  • #13
sophiecentaur said:
... http://img840.imageshack.us/img840/6112/wink5.gif​
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K