Can a Water-Filled Flywheel Generate Extra Energy While in Motion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flywheel
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that filling a flywheel with water while in motion does not generate extra energy; instead, it results in energy loss. Participants agree that the momentum remains constant, but the kinetic energy decreases due to friction and the acceleration of the water. The final state of the flywheel is slower than its initial state, demonstrating that energy and momentum are preserved in a closed system, but kinetic energy is not enhanced.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and momentum principles
  • Familiarity with flywheel mechanics
  • Knowledge of friction and its effects on motion
  • Basic concepts of closed systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of kinetic energy and its relationship with momentum
  • Explore the mechanics of flywheels and their applications in energy storage
  • Study the effects of friction on moving systems
  • Investigate closed system dynamics and energy conservation laws
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in energy systems and the principles of motion.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
If i had a driven flywheel with a hollow outer rim, and could rapidly fill it with water while in motion, would i gain any energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you will rapidly fiill it with water while moving, in the first moment water would be still, than friction would cause the water to start moving but the friction would also slow down the flywheel. Means no. You won't gain any energy.
 
Actually, you would lose energy. The momentum would remain the same, and the net energy would decrease. As Tominator said, the flywheel would slow down as the water accelerated, and the final state would be significantly slower than the initial state.
 
Assume that the flywheel has water in it but it's walls are frictionless so the water isn't moving. Then assume vanes in the flywheel are deployed to accelerate the water up to flywheel speed. Ignoring losses to heat, it's a closed system, so energy and momentum are preserved.
 
Ah, thanks every one.
 
Jeff Reid said:
Assume that the flywheel has water in it but it's walls are frictionless so the water isn't moving. Then assume vanes in the flywheel are deployed to accelerate the water up to flywheel speed. Ignoring losses to heat, it's a closed system, so energy and momentum are preserved.

True. I was thinking of kinetic energy, which would decrease (and heat would increase).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K