Can a Wired System Achieve 100% Efficiency?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yetaphow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of achieving 100% efficiency in a wired system, particularly in the context of solar cells and energy transfer through wires. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical limitations, and the efficiency of various components involved in energy systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that while solar cells can theoretically be 100% efficient, energy loss occurs due to the resistance in wires, which creates heat.
  • Another participant argues that normal wires always lead to energy loss through heat, proposing superconductors as an alternative, though noting the current limitations of their temperature requirements.
  • A different participant clarifies that the law of conservation of energy, rather than the law of diminishing returns, is relevant to the discussion of energy efficiency.
  • Some participants express that solar cells and electric lamps have low efficiencies, referencing the second law of thermodynamics as a contributing factor.
  • There is a contention regarding the definition of efficiency, with some focusing on the performance of solar cells while others emphasize the entire system, including lamps and energy transfer mechanisms.
  • One participant mentions the challenge of achieving a closed-loop system that maintains efficiency, referencing the concept of perpetual motion in a critical light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the efficiency of solar cells, the role of wires, and the applicability of different physical laws. Disagreements persist about the definitions and implications of efficiency in the context of energy systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the practicalities of achieving 100% efficiency, particularly in relation to the limitations of current technology, such as the need for cooling superconductors. There are also unresolved discussions about the definitions of efficiency and the laws of thermodynamics as they apply to the topic.

Yetaphow
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was discussing solar cells with my friend and we began talking about law of diminishing returns when once a light is lit up, it will send some of the light to the solar cell and energy back into the bulb. When it goes back to the bulb, it won't have as much energy as it did to light the bulb in the first place. As we go on speaking in theory-crafting on possible instances if a solar cell was actually 100% efficient it would still lose energy! He claims this because of the wires. I know some wires do offer resistances which creates heat and therefore you have loss of energy which is loss of efficiency. I told him in any system that has 100% efficiency that there would be no energy lost. He told me I'm missing the point and I told him yes you can lose efficiency through a wire, but this is a system which is the ENTIRE unit. The wires are part of the system. Is there any system that has 100% efficiency involving wires? If so, what type of wires are they? What would the system need?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Normal wires will always lead to some loss through heat, the only alternative would be superconductors which have zero resistance. Problem is we don't have any that function at room temperature, so you would need to use more energy to cool them to the point where they will become superconductors than you would get off of the lightbulb.
 
Welcome to PF.

That's not the law of diminishing returns, that's the law of conservation of energy.

The efficiency of the energy transfer through wires can be so high that you don't need to consider it in an efficiency calculation: much better than 99% for short wires of sufficient size. Light bulbs, mirrors to reflect light, and solar cells all have such low efficiency that such a system could only recover a few percent of the energy it used.
 
solar cells have garbage efficiency as explained by the 2nd law
 
Cool.. thanks guys!
 
Curl said:
solar cells have garbage efficiency as explained by the 2nd law

And so do electric lamps (in this context, at least).
 
sophiecentaur said:
And so do electric lamps (in this context, at least).

You mean incandescent lamps? Correct.
 
Any lamp is inefficient if you want all the energy into end up as light, getting to the PV cells. It won't get round the loop many timed with even the best lamp you can find.
 
It's not about the lamp, its more about the cells. Efficiency is plagued because of the 2nd law.
 
  • #10
?
It's about everything.
It's Perpetaul Motion he's suggesting.
 
  • #11
Thanks again..He still claims law of diminishing returns, "in a closed-loop system." It is easier to blow out a light bulb with him I suppose. The only law of diminishing returns I know that it relates to would be economics specifically when an application yields ineffectiveness.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K