Can AB-BA ever equal the identity matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hamsterman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for no two matrices A and B, the equation A*B - B*A = I (where I is the identity matrix) holds true. Participants explore various approaches, including the use of matrix inverses and determinants, specifically referencing Sylvester's determinant theorem. The conclusion emphasizes that the trace of the commutator AB - BA equals zero, indicating that the identity matrix cannot be achieved through this operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication and properties
  • Familiarity with determinants and their properties
  • Knowledge of Sylvester's determinant theorem
  • Concept of the trace of a matrix
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Sylvester's determinant theorem in matrix theory
  • Study the properties of the trace in relation to matrix commutators
  • Explore advanced topics in linear algebra, particularly regarding matrix identities
  • Investigate examples of matrices that cannot be expressed as a product of two others
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in advanced matrix theory and its applications.

hamsterman
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
The task is to prove that for no two matrices A and B, A*B - B*A = I, where I is the identity matrix.
I tried multiplying by the inverses of A or B, but that doesn't seem to lead to a more manageable form. The only way I see this could be done is by writing down all n*n (assuming n by n matrices) linear equations. It's easy to do when n = 2, but the same contradiction may not be as obvious for higher n.
I hope there is a more intelligent way to go about this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you know about determinants?
 
I know that det(AB) = det(BA), but I don't know what are the properties when subtraction is involved. Except for the case when only one line is different.
 
hamsterman said:
I know that det(AB) = det(BA), but I don't know what are the properties when subtraction is involved.

Determinant is just a number, isn't it?
 
What I mean is that I don't know what is det(AB-BA) even if I do know det(AB) and det(BA).
I'm looking at Sylvester's determinant theorem which looks related, but I still don't see a solution. Now I need to prove that for no M, det(M+I) = det(M)[STRIKE], at least when M = AB..[/STRIKE] (now that I think about it, there is probably no matrix that can't be written as a product of two others, is there?)
 
hamsterman said:
What I mean is that I don't know what is det(AB-BA) even if I do know det(AB) and det(BA).
I'm looking at Sylvester's determinant theorem which looks related, but I still don't see a solution. Now I need to prove that for no M, det(M+I) = det(M)[STRIKE], at least when M = AB..[/STRIKE] (now that I think about it, there is probably no matrix that can't be written as a product of two others, is there?)

Try taking the trace.
 
So tr(AB-BA) = 0 ? Great. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K