Can Absolute Entropy Be Calculated Directly from State Variables?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of absolute entropy in thermodynamics, particularly in relation to ideal gases. Participants are exploring the validity of expressions for entropy based on state variables and the implications of using different equations, such as the Sackur-Tetrode equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are debating the correctness of expressing absolute entropy using a specific formula involving temperature and volume. There are questions about the nature of absolute entropy and the significance of entropy differences versus absolute values.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the limitations of certain equations and the context in which they apply. There is an ongoing examination of different interpretations of entropy calculations, with no clear consensus reached on the validity of the original expression proposed by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of constraints related to coursework familiarity, as some participants express a preference for sticking to material covered in their classes rather than introducing external equations. Additionally, the discussion touches on the relevance of absolute zero and its implications for entropy calculations.

Urmi Roy
Messages
743
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



So as a part of a very long question on homework for thermodynamics, I and some of my friends got into a debate about how to write an expression for entropy at a particular state.


Homework Equations



delS(state 1 to 2)= Cv*ln(T2/T1)+R*ln(V2/V1)

(from constitutive relation for entropy change in an ideal gas)

The Attempt at a Solution



Is is correct to say S1 (absolute value of entropy of a gaseous system in state 1)= Cv*ln(T1)+R*ln(V1)?

I don't think so, coz you can't really calculate the absolute value of entropy ...unless you take the absolute zero temperature as reference state...in which case the above expression would contain -(Cv*ln(T0)+R*ln(V0))...and you'd still be taking 'change' in entropy rather than an 'absolute value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Urmi Roy said:
That comes from statistical mechanics...I'm talking about the entropy constitutive equations.
What is that supposed to mean? Entropy is entropy, however you calculate it.

Take an ideal gas at ##T_1## and ##V_1## and calculate the entropy using the Sackur-Tetrode equation, which is correct, and compare to what you get with your equation. Do you get the same result? No? Then your equation is not valid.
 
Well in the link you provided V and T don't even come in. Anyway, I haven't come across the 'Sackur-Tetrode' equation in my course, and I'd like to stick to my course-work. Also, what you said so far doesn't answer my OP.
 
Urmi Roy said:
Also, what you said so far doesn't answer my OP.

Urmi Roy said:
Is is correct to say S1 (absolute value of entropy of a gaseous system in state 1)= Cv*ln(T1)+R*ln(V1)?
I think I answered that quite clearly.
 
This is done in e.g. steam tables where a given (T,p) coordinate is assigned zero entropy, then all other states do have an "absolute" entropy number. But there is no meaning attached to anyone number; it's only the difference between two numbers at different states that is significant.

And forget about absolute zero. You're delving ito some pretty fancy quantum mechanics there which I would avoid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
rude man said:
This is done in e.g. steam tables where a given (T,p) coordinate is assigned zero entropy, then all other states do have an "absolute" entropy number. But there is no meaning attached to anyone number; it's only the difference between two numbers at different states that is significant.

rude man: Exactly what I was talking about. So you agree that we can't just write :
S1=Cv*ln(T1)+R*ln(V1)?

Interestingly, in the Sackur Tetrode equation, the entropy at a given state is given as a function of the volume and internal energy at the given state...so does that contradict your statement that "; it's only the difference between two numbers at different states that is significant"?
 
Urmi Roy said:
rude man: Exactly what I was talking about. So you agree that we can't just write :
S1=Cv*ln(T1)+R*ln(V1)?
Yes. Absolutely!
Interestingly, in the Sackur Tetrode equation, the entropy at a given state is given as a function of the volume and internal energy at the given state...so does that contradict your statement that "; it's only the difference between two numbers at different states that is significant"?

As I said, there you're dealing with quantum mechanics. There are good reasons not to get "involved" with that equation. It only applies to a monatomic ideal gas, only under limited conditions, and it predicts negative infinity for the entropy at absolute zero.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackur–Tetrode_equation

Stay away from such irrelevancies at the introductory physics level and even at the undergraduate heat & thermodynamics course level. Entropy differences are all that matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
26K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
21K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K