Can All Functions Be Parameterized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
Parameterizing functions of scalars and vectors can vary significantly based on the specific curve or surface involved. When dealing with level curves, one approach is to express one variable in terms of another, using it as a parameter. For example, the level curve defined by y - x² - 2x = 0 can be parameterized as r(t) = (t² + 2t, t). However, there is no universal method for parameterization, as different curves may require unique approaches, and some curves may not be smoothly parameterizable. Ultimately, while many functions can be parameterized, certain complex or discontinuous functions may present challenges in finding a suitable parameterization.
darkar
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Is there a specific method to parameterised a function of scalar and vector?

I was reading through this website but then, can't understand how it read taht parameterised steps.

Any guide?

(http://www.math.umn.edu/~nykamp/m2374/readings/stokesex/index.html
under double check example)

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think there is a method that works in all cases. But when the curve is specified as a level curve f(x,y)=0, you can try to solve for y. In that case, just use x as the parameter.

Exemple: Consider the level curve C={(x,y): y-x²-2x=0. We can solve of y like so: y=x²+2x. In that case, the parametrized curve is r(t)=(t²+2t,t), t \in \mathbb{R}.

In other cases, if the relation between x and y is something familiar you can try to exploit this as illustrated in the following exemple:

Exemple: Consider the level curve C={(x,y): (x/a)²-(y/b)²=1}. This resembles the identity cosh²(t)-sinh²(t)=1. So set x(t)/a=cosh(t) and y(t)/b=sinh(t), i.e. let r(t)=(acosh(t),bsinh(t)) t \in \mathbb{R} parametrize the level curve.

N.B. You can convince yourself that this parametrization covers the whole curve because given any value of x, there is a corresponding value of t for which acosh(t)=x and similarly for y. [cosh(t) is surjective on the x-axis and sinh(t) is surjective on the y axis]. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sinh_cosh_tanh.svg
 
No wait, cosh(t) is not surjective on the real line, it only covers (1, infty). So r(t) would only cover part of C.
 
As quasar987 said, there is no one method of parameterizing a curve. In fact, there exist an infinite number of different parameterizations for any curve.

For the example given, because the path (From the origin, (0, 0, 0) along the z-axis to (0, 0 1), then along the quarter circle to (0, 1, 0), then along the y-axis to (0, 0, 0) again) is not "smooth" (there are corners at (0,0,0), (0, 1, 0) and (0, 0, 1)), you would break it into three pieces.

First the line from (0, 0, 0) to (0, 0, 1). At any point on that line, x=y= 0
An obvious parameterization is to use z itself as parameter: x= 0, y= 0, z= t, with 0\le t\le 1.
Second, the quarter circle from (0, 0, 1) to (0, 1, 0). At every point on that circle x= 0 and y2+ z2= 1. A "standard" parameterization for a circle is to use sine and cosine: x= 0, y= sin(t), z= cos(t). Then x= 0 always while y2+ z2= sin2(t)+ cos2(t)= 1 for all t. Of course, it is z= cos(t) and not y because when t= 0, z= cos(0)= 1 and y= sin(0)= 0 as required. When t= \pi/2, z= cos(\pi/2)= 0 and y= sin(\pi/2)= 1 so 0\le t\le \pi/2.

Finally, the line from (0, 1, 0) to (0, 0, 0). Obviously x= z= 0 at every point. We could use y itself as parameter: x= 0, y= t, z= 0 with t going from 1 to 0. Another possibility is x= 0, y= 1- t, z= 0 with t going from 0 to 1.
 
Oh rite, i see.
Thanks for helps!

Edit: oh, btw, is there any functions that can't be parameterized?
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K