Can an Ant Survive Walking on a Soap Bubble?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bubble Soap
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores whether a tiny sugar ant can walk on a soap bubble, considering the physical interactions between the ant and the bubble's surface. Participants examine the implications of surface tension, gravity, and the ant's weight, as well as the potential outcomes of such an experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that an ant could walk on a soap bubble without it bursting, citing that bubbles can sustain contact without breaking.
  • Others argue that the ant may struggle to gain traction and could be more likely to "swim" on the surface rather than walk.
  • One participant expresses concern that gravity would pull the ant down, making it difficult for the ant to remain on the surface.
  • Another participant discusses the physics of the situation, calculating that the pressure exerted by the ant's feet is lower than the pressure jump across the bubble's surface, suggesting the ant's weight could be supported.
  • A participant shares a personal experiment where an ant was placed on soap foam, noting that it became immobilized and eventually stopped moving, leading to concerns about the ant's well-being.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether an ant can successfully walk on a soap bubble, with multiple competing views on the feasibility and outcomes of such an interaction.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the physical properties of soap bubbles and the ant's interaction with them, including the effects of surface tension and gravity. The outcomes of personal experiments are anecdotal and may not represent broader conclusions.

maze
Messages
661
Reaction score
4
Could a tiny sugar ant walk on a soap bubble? Would the bubble burst? Would the ant be able to locomote along the surface or would it get stuck?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can touch bubbles without them bursting, so I guess an ant could.
Find an ant, make a bubble, put the ant on it. It might even work :D
 
I'm guessing it would be pretty difficult, but an ant could walk across a soap bubble. As mike mentioned, you can make significant sustained contact with a bubble without it bursting. To the ant it may be more like swimming though.
 
I'm fairly certain that the pull of gravity would move the ant downward, and the traction it could achieve would not be sufficient to counter that pull. It would be like trying to swim up a waterfall.
 
As Lurch observes, it wouldn't get much traction if it could walk. It would be more like swimming. Whether the ant will be suspened on the surface, be drawn-in, or pop the film depends upon the chemistry of it's legs and what it's been walking in.

One of http://www.bio.miami.edu/~cmallery/150/chemistry/c3x3waterbug.jpg" should manage to sit on a soap membrane.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People are not considering the fact that soap bubbles have *two* interfaces; the soapy water is a thin film.

Given that the interfacial energy of pure water in air is about 70 dyn/cm (70 erg/cm^2), say the interfacial energy of soapy water about 10 dyn/cm.

An ant weighs about 3 mg, so each 'foot' has 0.5 mg spread over (say) 0.1 mm^2. 'g' ~ 1000 cm/s^2, so each foot exerts about 0.5 dyn/mm^2 (5*10^-3 dyn/cm^2) pressure.

The pressure jump across one interface of a 5 cm diameter soap bubble is 2* 10 dyn/cm * (2/2.5 cm) = 16*dyn/cm^2. This is much higher than the foot pressure of an ant, so the ant's weight should be supported by the bubble.
 
Usually I have to keep things super clean or else ants will take over, but now that I'm actually looking for sugar ants to drop on a soap bubble, I can't find any.

:/
 
maze said:
Usually I have to keep things super clean or else ants will take over, but now that I'm actually looking for sugar ants to drop on a soap bubble, I can't find any.

:/

Check outside near the cracks of sidewalks or near the crevices of a patio
 
Put a piece of food on the ground and wait 30 minutes
 
  • #10
Andy Resnick said:
People are not considering the fact that soap bubbles have *two* interfaces; the soapy water is a thin film.

Given that the interfacial energy of pure water in air is about 70 dyn/cm (70 erg/cm^2), say the interfacial energy of soapy water about 10 dyn/cm.

An ant weighs about 3 mg, so each 'foot' has 0.5 mg spread over (say) 0.1 mm^2. 'g' ~ 1000 cm/s^2, so each foot exerts about 0.5 dyn/mm^2 (5*10^-3 dyn/cm^2) pressure.

The pressure jump across one interface of a 5 cm diameter soap bubble is 2* 10 dyn/cm * (2/2.5 cm) = 16*dyn/cm^2. This is much higher than the foot pressure of an ant, so the ant's weight should be supported by the bubble.

Thanks, you taught me ants have 6 legs. I never reely noticed:approve:
 
  • #11
Ok, I found an ant and dropped it on a soap foam. The bubbles were about 1/2 the size of the ant (ie: 2 bubbles = 1 ant).

The ant basically got stuck in the top layer of foam, immobilized. I believe its body geometry was serving as boundary conditions for the foam surface. After about a second of just sitting there, it spazzed out kicking its legs every way, which caused it to sink slightly to the 2nd or 3rd layer, and then after a couple seconds it stopped moving so I took it out. I think it died, which I didn't expect to happen (especially not after only a few seconds). I don't think I will be trying again since it seems a pretty cruel way to go.
 
  • #12
maze said:
Ok, I found an ant and dropped it on a soap foam. The bubbles were about 1/2 the size of the ant (ie: 2 bubbles = 1 ant).

The ant basically got stuck in the top layer of foam, immobilized. I believe its body geometry was serving as boundary conditions for the foam surface. After about a second of just sitting there, it spazzed out kicking its legs every way, which caused it to sink slightly to the 2nd or 3rd layer, and then after a couple seconds it stopped moving so I took it out. I think it died, which I didn't expect to happen (especially not after only a few seconds). I don't think I will be trying again since it seems a pretty cruel way to go.

Thanks for the update as this certainly is interesting.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K