I Can an enclosure surrounding a Tx antenna act as a receiving antenna?

AI Thread Summary
Wiring a metal cuboid as an antenna poses significant challenges due to its inability to generate differential currents and voltages necessary for effective transmission. Unlike dipole antennas, a cuboid lacks the required structure to function properly without modifications, such as introducing a slot to allow electromagnetic fields to be detected. An ideal enclosure would reflect radiated fields and present a pure reactance to the transmitter, preventing power delivery. Real-world applications must consider imperfections, like leakage, to achieve functional antenna performance. Understanding these limitations is crucial for designing effective antenna systems.
genekuli
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
If I put a metal enclosure, eg. cuboid, around a Tx antenna, can the metal enclosure, since it is completely surrounding the antenna, act as a receiver (a receiving antenna) even if it is not of any specific dimension relating to the frequency of the TX antenna radiation within it?
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
genekuli said:
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
That's the key point, I believe. How are you going to wire up a metal cuboid to act as an antenna? An antenna develops a receive voltage at its output terminals as a result of the EM radiation generating differential currents and hence differential voltages. A cuboid doesn't have 2 halves like a dipole, and if you try to use it as a monopole with respect to a ground plane, I don't think the Tx antenna inside it will generate any differential currents or voltages with respect to the ground plane.

Do you have a particular application in mind? If you describe the application, we may be able to suggest some antenna geometries that could work. Or is this just a question that came up as you were learning about EM and antennas?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and genekuli
For the 'enclosure' to do other than just reflect the radiated fields, it needs to have a break in it (a slot, for instance) so that an EMF can be detected across it.
So if your enclosure is 'ideal' (silver plated and welded all around) then the transmitting antenna will present to the transmitter as a pure reactance with no resistance. It would give most transmitters a headache as it could deliver no power.

This is one of those irrisistable force meets an immovable object type questions. In real life, the setup can't exist so you'd have to allow some imperfection, like leakage through the enclosure. Once you do that, you can calculate some sort of a real answer.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Hello! I am generating electrons from a 3D gaussian source. The electrons all have the same energy, but the direction is isotropic. The electron source is in between 2 plates that act as a capacitor, and one of them acts as a time of flight (tof) detector. I know the voltage on the plates very well, and I want to extract the center of the gaussian distribution (in one direction only), by measuring the tof of many electrons. So the uncertainty on the position is given by the tof uncertainty...
Back
Top