I Can an enclosure surrounding a Tx antenna act as a receiving antenna?

Click For Summary
Wiring a metal cuboid as an antenna poses significant challenges due to its inability to generate differential currents and voltages necessary for effective transmission. Unlike dipole antennas, a cuboid lacks the required structure to function properly without modifications, such as introducing a slot to allow electromagnetic fields to be detected. An ideal enclosure would reflect radiated fields and present a pure reactance to the transmitter, preventing power delivery. Real-world applications must consider imperfections, like leakage, to achieve functional antenna performance. Understanding these limitations is crucial for designing effective antenna systems.
genekuli
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
If I put a metal enclosure, eg. cuboid, around a Tx antenna, can the metal enclosure, since it is completely surrounding the antenna, act as a receiver (a receiving antenna) even if it is not of any specific dimension relating to the frequency of the TX antenna radiation within it?
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
genekuli said:
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
That's the key point, I believe. How are you going to wire up a metal cuboid to act as an antenna? An antenna develops a receive voltage at its output terminals as a result of the EM radiation generating differential currents and hence differential voltages. A cuboid doesn't have 2 halves like a dipole, and if you try to use it as a monopole with respect to a ground plane, I don't think the Tx antenna inside it will generate any differential currents or voltages with respect to the ground plane.

Do you have a particular application in mind? If you describe the application, we may be able to suggest some antenna geometries that could work. Or is this just a question that came up as you were learning about EM and antennas?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and genekuli
For the 'enclosure' to do other than just reflect the radiated fields, it needs to have a break in it (a slot, for instance) so that an EMF can be detected across it.
So if your enclosure is 'ideal' (silver plated and welded all around) then the transmitting antenna will present to the transmitter as a pure reactance with no resistance. It would give most transmitters a headache as it could deliver no power.

This is one of those irrisistable force meets an immovable object type questions. In real life, the setup can't exist so you'd have to allow some imperfection, like leakage through the enclosure. Once you do that, you can calculate some sort of a real answer.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
977
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K