I Can an enclosure surrounding a Tx antenna act as a receiving antenna?

AI Thread Summary
Wiring a metal cuboid as an antenna poses significant challenges due to its inability to generate differential currents and voltages necessary for effective transmission. Unlike dipole antennas, a cuboid lacks the required structure to function properly without modifications, such as introducing a slot to allow electromagnetic fields to be detected. An ideal enclosure would reflect radiated fields and present a pure reactance to the transmitter, preventing power delivery. Real-world applications must consider imperfections, like leakage, to achieve functional antenna performance. Understanding these limitations is crucial for designing effective antenna systems.
genekuli
Messages
68
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
If I put a metal enclosure, eg. cuboid, around a Tx antenna, can the metal enclosure, since it is completely surrounding the antenna, act as a receiver (a receiving antenna) even if it is not of any specific dimension relating to the frequency of the TX antenna radiation within it?
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
 
Physics news on Phys.org
genekuli said:
of course it would all have to be wired up correctly
That's the key point, I believe. How are you going to wire up a metal cuboid to act as an antenna? An antenna develops a receive voltage at its output terminals as a result of the EM radiation generating differential currents and hence differential voltages. A cuboid doesn't have 2 halves like a dipole, and if you try to use it as a monopole with respect to a ground plane, I don't think the Tx antenna inside it will generate any differential currents or voltages with respect to the ground plane.

Do you have a particular application in mind? If you describe the application, we may be able to suggest some antenna geometries that could work. Or is this just a question that came up as you were learning about EM and antennas?
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and genekuli
For the 'enclosure' to do other than just reflect the radiated fields, it needs to have a break in it (a slot, for instance) so that an EMF can be detected across it.
So if your enclosure is 'ideal' (silver plated and welded all around) then the transmitting antenna will present to the transmitter as a pure reactance with no resistance. It would give most transmitters a headache as it could deliver no power.

This is one of those irrisistable force meets an immovable object type questions. In real life, the setup can't exist so you'd have to allow some imperfection, like leakage through the enclosure. Once you do that, you can calculate some sort of a real answer.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top