Can angular motion exist outside of a gravity field?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the existence of angular motion in a theoretical void devoid of gravity or external reference points. Participants explore concepts related to motion, acceleration, and the implications of centrifugal forces in such conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that angular acceleration can occur without gravity, using the example of astronauts turning on maneuvering jets to illustrate centrifugal effects due to inertia.
  • Others discuss the concept of centrifuges existing outside a gravitational field, referencing historical ideas about rotating space stations designed to simulate gravity through centrifugal force.
  • A participant raises questions about how motion and acceleration can be perceived or measured in a void, emphasizing the role of rocket engines and accelerometers in space.
  • Mach's principle is mentioned as a philosophical perspective on motion, although its relevance to modern physics is contested by some participants.
  • There is a discussion about angular motion of electrons in TV screens, with differing views on whether this constitutes the same type of motion as that described by the original poster regarding centrifuges.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the nature of angular motion, distinguishing between the motion of electrons and the spinning motion of a centrifuge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of angular motion in the absence of gravity, with some agreeing on the possibility of such motion while others contest the applicability of certain concepts like Mach's principle. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of angular motion as it relates to different contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of angular motion and the assumptions made about the conditions under which it can exist. The relationship between different types of motion and the role of external forces is not fully clarified.

jed1408
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I can't find the answer anywhere here's my question. can a centrifuge exist outside a field of gravity. More specifically, in a theoretical void of nothing without stars in view or any point of reference for comparison how could motion like spinning or acceleration exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome.

Yes. Angular acceleration can occur in the absence of gravity or other masses.

If astronauts Alice and Bob held hands and turned on their maneuvering jets, they would pirouette around each other like a planet and moon.

Whether or not they could see an external reference point such as a star, they would experience a centrifugal pull trying to separate them. This pull is simply inertia - their bodies trying to proceed in straight lines but constrained to go in a curve. All things with mass have inertia.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G, vanhees71, AlexB23 and 1 other person
jed1408 said:
More specifically, in a theoretical void of nothing without stars in view or any point of reference for comparison how could motion like spinning or acceleration exist?
How can they exist or how do we know? Obviously you use rocket engines to make acceleration happen in space. And you know you're accelerating because you can feel it or measure it with an accelerometer.

Moving this thread to Classical Physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn and vanhees71
jed1408 said:
I can't find the answer anywhere here's my question. can a centrifuge exist outside a field of gravity. More specifically, in a theoretical void of nothing without stars in view or any point of reference for comparison how could motion like spinning or acceleration exist?
A centrifuge can exist without a field of gravity. Back in the 20th century, scientists and futurists developed concepts for rotating space stations, which are basically giant centrifuges. At a certain speed, which can be calculated by station radius and revolutions per unit time, the force inside the space station would equal 1 G. Sadly, due to cost restraints, no rotating space station has been built.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, vanhees71 and PeroK
jed1408 said:
I can't find the answer anywhere here's my question. can a centrifuge exist outside a field of gravity. More specifically, in a theoretical void of nothing without stars in view or any point of reference for comparison how could motion like spinning or acceleration exist?
:welcome:

You've got some simple (and IMO correct) answers. If, however, you would like a trip down a philosophical rabbit hole, you could read up on Mach's principle:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach's_principle
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137 and mpresic3
Moderator's note: Thread title changed to be more descriptive.
 
But Mach's principle is neither a clear concept nor has it anything to do with the modern understanding of physics of spacetime, i.e., general relativity, although Einstein said that he was inspired by Mach's ideas on inertia. As you say, indeed it's a philosophical rabbit hole!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Clearly the electrons in our TV screens are in angular motion thanks to electromagnetic forces. No mention of gravity
 
mpresic3 said:
Clearly the electrons in our TV screens are in angular motion thanks to electromagnetic forces. No mention of gravity
Can you "clearly" describe the "angular motion" that you think electromagnetic forces impart to electrons in TV screens? And are you referring to older CRT-based TVs or current LCD/LED displays?
 
  • #10
I am saying an electron beam starts out (say) along the x axis, and later is is deflected say by angle theta. Isn't this angular motion?
 
  • #11
mpresic3 said:
Isn't this angular motion?
In a sense it is, but it's not "spinning" like a "centrifuge", which are the terms the OP of this thread used.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K