- #1
- 20
- 0
I know about the tessaract and I'd like to understand more about it from a Euclidean perspective so I may translate it algebraically.
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd like to understand more about it from a Euclidean perspective
Per the rules of this forum (https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-global-guidelines.414380/ ):My goal is to find ways to start linking the dimensions for a few book hypotheses I have written.
Non-mainstream theories:
Generally, in the forums we do not allow the following:
- Discussion of theories that appear only on personal web sites, self-published books, etc.
- Challenges to mainstream theories (relativity, the Big Bang, etc.) that go beyond current professional discussion
- Attempts to promote or resuscitate theories that have been discredited or superseded (e.g. Lorentz ether theory); this does not exclude discussion of those theories in a purely historical context
- Personal theories or speculations that go beyond or counter to generally-accepted science
- Mixing science and religion, e.g. using religious doctrines in support of scientific arguments or vice versa.
- Philosophical discussions are permitted only at the discretion of the mentors and may be deleted or closed without warning or appeal.
I don't know what a Manifold is, I'll look it up.
Perhaps you can help my other thread question.
Generally meaning it is due to the tone of the message and not the letter.
I am asking about 4-dimensional space on a three dimensional graph. In much the same way that you put a straight line (1 dimensional) on any chart.
Can someone answer my last threads question or expound on manifolds for me please.
No, actually, you brought it up when you said this (which I quoted):Well I just want some help and answers, but since you brought it up.
You're a new member here, so might not be aware of our rules, especially those on personal theories and the like.My goal is to find ways to start linking the dimensions for a few book hypotheses I have written.