Can anyone help me make the connection here

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rayrey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the Poisson Bracket of a function F and the Hamiltonian H, specifically expressed as [F,H] = dF/dt - ∂F/∂t. The total derivative of F with respect to time is defined as dF/dt = ∂F/∂t + ∂F/∂q * dq/dt + ∂F/∂p * dp/dt, highlighting the distinction between total and partial derivatives. The conversation also emphasizes the use of Hamilton-Jacobi equations to reformulate the expression in terms of H and clarifies the notation used in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Poisson Brackets in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamilton-Jacobi equations
  • Knowledge of multivariable calculus and the chain rule
  • Concept of total versus partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Poisson Bracket in classical mechanics
  • Explore Hamilton-Jacobi theory and its applications
  • Review multivariable calculus focusing on the chain rule
  • Investigate examples of total and partial derivatives in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in classical mechanics, as well as mathematicians interested in the applications of calculus in dynamic systems.

rayrey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
if F is any function and H is the hamiltonian, then the Poisson Bracket of F and H, is given by:

[F,H] = dF/dt - [tex]\partial[/tex]F/[tex]\partial[/tex]t

Can someone show me how the right side of this equation comes about?
Also how can the normal derivative of F w.r.t t be different from the partial of F w.r.t t?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case, where F is any function of coordinates and momenta (i.e. F=F(t,q,p), where the position and momentum depend upon time) the total derivative of F with respect to time will be [tex]\frac{dF}{dt}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial q}\frac{d q}{dt}+\frac{\partial F}{\partial p}\frac{dp}{dt}[/tex].

Now, use the Hamilton-Jacobi equations, to get the equation in terms of H, and use the definition of the Poisson Bracket of H and F to get the equation in the required form.
 
rayrey said:
Also how can the normal derivative of F w.r.t t be different from the partial of F w.r.t t?

This is a standard abuse of notation.

Suppose, for example, [itex]F = F \left( q, p, t \right)[/itex] ([itex]F:\mathbb{R}^3 \leftarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex]), and [itex]q = q \left( t \right)[/itex] and [itex]p = p \left( t \right)[/itex] (i.e., each is a map from [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] to [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]).

Define a new function [tex]\tilde{F} \left( t \right) = F\left( q\left(t) , p\left(t)\right), t \right)[/tex] (another map from [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] to [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]) by composition of functions. The multivariable chain rule then gives

[tex] \frac{d \tilde{F}}{dt} = \frac{\partial F}{\partial q} \frac{dq}{dt} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial p} \frac{dp}{dt} + \frac{\partial F}{\partial t}.[/tex]

Even though [itex]F[/itex] and [tex]\tilde{F}[/tex] are different functions, as they have different domains, it is standard to omit the twiddle.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K