Can Anyone Help Solve This Statistical Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Master
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical
Click For Summary
A user is seeking assistance with a statistical problem but is experiencing issues with their scanner, preventing them from sharing their progress visually. They express a desire for help in completing the problem. Responses indicate frustration over the lack of effort to type out the details instead of relying on an image. The discussion highlights the importance of clear communication in problem-solving. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for users to provide sufficient context to receive effective assistance.
The_Master
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi every body
i have a problem and i want to make sure about my results. I tried to put my progress but my scanner doesn't response. So i wonder if anyone could help me to complete the problem.
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/5944/dddhs1.jpg
REGARDS
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Apparently you are able to type. If it is too much work for you to type out what you have done, I don't imagine you are terribly concerned about the problem.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K