Can AxB be equal to the empty set if either A or B is empty?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 6K views
kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I just need to decide how to show this by contradiction.
If either A or B is the empty set then AxB=[tex]\oslash[/tex].



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Here is how I started:
Assume either A or B is the empty set and AxB[tex]\neq[/tex][tex]\oslash[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that the correct way to do a proof by contradiciton?
AxB is defined as the set consisting of all ordered pairs (x,y) in which x is an element of A and y is an element of B. So, x and y exist?
 
Close: if you assume [tex]A \times B \ne \emptyset[/tex], there must be at least
one element [tex](a,b) \in A \times B[/tex]. If you think about the definition of cartesian products, this will lead to a contradiction - about what? (Hint: what did you assume about [tex]A \text{ and } B[/tex]?)
 
Ok here's my idea for the proof.
Let A = null set and B be arbitrary. Then AxB= null set because of the definition of AxB. But there is no x which is an element of A. Therefore AxB=null set. Thus, contradiciton.
 
No - you can't assume [tex]A \times B = \emptyset[/tex] and try to proceed with a proof by contradiction.

Assume [tex]A= \emptyset[/tex] ([tex]B[/tex] may or may not be empty: that is unimiportant).

If [tex]A \times B \ne \emptyset[/tex], then (by definition of the Cartesian Product and non-empty set)
you can find an element of the product, say [tex](a,b) \in A \times B[/tex].

This means [tex]b \in B[/tex]. From where do you get the object [tex]a[/tex]?
Answering the second question gives the contradiction.
 
a is an element of A.
Oh, but then that mean A is nonempt and this a contradicition?
 
"a is an element of A.
Oh, but then that mean A is nonempt and this a contradicition?"

:smile: - yup - it contradicts [tex]A = \emptyset[/tex]