A Can Baryons with Positive Strangeness Exist?

Click For Summary
Baryons with positive strangeness are generally considered non-existent according to "Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics" by A. Bettini. The discussion highlights that sigma-baryons possess negative strangeness due to their quark composition. It clarifies that while baryons have negative strangeness, their corresponding antiparticles exhibit positive strangeness. This distinction between baryons and antibaryons is crucial for understanding strangeness in particle physics. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of this important differentiation.
Federica
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I read on "Intoduction to Elementary Particle Physics" (A. Bettini) that baryons with positive strangeness cannot exist. I don't know what to conclude from this sentence: sigma-baryons have negative strangeness, since there's a sigma as valence quark. But these baryons have, of course, their own antiparticles, which should have positive strangeness, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The author must be distinguishing between baryons and antibaryons. Indeed strange antibaryons have positive strangeness.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, vanhees71, Federica and 1 other person
Ok, I didn't think of that. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...
Hello everyone, I am trying to calculate the energy loss and straggling of alpha particles with same energy, I used LISE++ to obtain the energy loss in every layer of the materials using Spectrometer Design of LISE++, but I can only calculate the energy-loss straggling layer by layer. Does anyone know the way to obtain the energy-loss straggling caused by every layer? Any help would be appreciated. J.