Can democracy coexist with theocracy?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential coexistence of democracy and theocracy, exploring the implications of religious influence on democratic governance. Participants examine historical contexts, contemporary examples, and theoretical models, raising questions about the future evolution of political systems in light of religious majorities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the conflict between religion and majority rule is increasingly evident, particularly in the United States, leading to questions about future governance.
  • Others propose the idea of a democratic theocracy or a theocratic democracy, raising the possibility of a future where democracy is viewed as outdated.
  • Concerns are expressed about the ability of the general populace to govern themselves, with some arguing that reliance on ancient texts could lead to a regression into theocracy.
  • Participants discuss the historical context of democracy and theocracy, referencing the founding fathers' intentions and the evolution of American governance.
  • There are claims about the nature of media influence, particularly regarding how religious narratives are presented in contemporary political discourse.
  • Some participants challenge the notion that the founding fathers intended for a strictly religious governance, citing their diverse beliefs and the secular foundations of the Constitution.
  • Debates arise over the interpretation of historical events, such as the election of George W. Bush, with differing views on whether it was a result of plurality or systemic factors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the compatibility of democracy and theocracy. Disagreements persist regarding historical interpretations, the role of religion in governance, and the implications of majority rule.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of historical events, differing definitions of democracy and theocracy, and unresolved questions about the future trajectory of political systems influenced by religious beliefs.

  • #31
Loren Booda said:
russ_wattersExcept when that "level below" involves 200,000,000 individuals overcoming states' powers.
Huh? Not following...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
In other words, if states provide legitimate centers of power, certainly individuals as fundamentals of government surpass them in number and naturalness.
 
  • #33
Russ was referring to services that are provided by states. The only context in which your statement makes sense is if you are referring to privately owned companies (which are legally considered individuals) providing the same services. If you are only trying to say that privately owned companies could provide the services better and more efficiently than either the state or federal government, you're probably right in most cases. At least I would agree with you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K