Can democracy coexist with theocracy?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the potential coexistence of democracy and theocracy, particularly in the context of the United States and its historical evolution. Participants debate the implications of majority rule in a religious context, questioning whether a democratic theocracy could emerge as a dominant form of governance. Key points include the historical perspectives on democracy, the role of religion in governance, and the potential for future political systems to evolve similarly to past ideologies like communism. The conversation highlights the complexities of voter behavior and the influence of media narratives on public perception.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of democratic principles and electoral systems
  • Familiarity with theocracy and its implications for governance
  • Knowledge of historical political ideologies, including communism and monarchy
  • Awareness of media influence on public opinion and political discourse
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of democratic theocracy and its historical examples
  • Examine the role of religion in modern governance systems
  • Analyze the impact of media on political elections and public perception
  • Study the evolution of political ideologies and their societal implications
USEFUL FOR

Political scientists, sociologists, historians, and anyone interested in the intersection of religion and governance in contemporary society.

  • #31
Loren Booda said:
russ_wattersExcept when that "level below" involves 200,000,000 individuals overcoming states' powers.
Huh? Not following...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
In other words, if states provide legitimate centers of power, certainly individuals as fundamentals of government surpass them in number and naturalness.
 
  • #33
Russ was referring to services that are provided by states. The only context in which your statement makes sense is if you are referring to privately owned companies (which are legally considered individuals) providing the same services. If you are only trying to say that privately owned companies could provide the services better and more efficiently than either the state or federal government, you're probably right in most cases. At least I would agree with you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K