MHB Can Different Parameterizations Yield the Same Line Integral Value?

Click For Summary
Different parameterizations of the same curve can yield the same value for the line integral, as demonstrated by comparing two parameterizations: c = (x(t), y(t), z(t)) and c = (x(τ²), y(τ²), z(τ²)). The line integral represents the arc length of the parameterized curve, and both parameterizations can be shown to produce equivalent integrals through variable substitution. By applying the chain rule, the relationship between the differentials dt and dτ is established, allowing for the transformation of the integrals. Ultimately, both integrals evaluate to the same value, confirming that different parameterizations do not affect the line integral outcome.
dgiroux48
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Consider the curve c= (x(t),y(t),z(t)) in space as t varies over [0, T ]. We could also parameterize this curve by
c= x(τ^2 ),y(τ^2 ),z(τ^2) τ ∈ [0, sqrt(T)].
Show that one obtains the same value for the line integral using either parameterization.

The line integral is just the integral for the arc legnth of the parameterized curve. I understand the concept intuitively, I just don't really know how to derive it.

(I don't know how to write out integral signs and all here but the formula can be found at this site Pauls Online Notes : Calculus III - Line Integrals - Part I)Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like it is just a matter of using the chain rule.

We are saying that (x(t), y(t), z(t)), for 0\le t\le T and (x(\tau^2), y(\tau^2), z(\tau^2)) are parameterizations of the same curve: t= \tau^2 so that dt= 2\tau d\tau.
 
1- $\int_{C_1} f(x,y,z)ds=\int_0^T f(x(t),y(t),z(t))||r(t)||dt$.

2- On the other hand, $\int_{C_2}f(x,y,z)ds=\int_0^{\sqrt{T}} f(x(t^2),y(t^2),z(t^2))||r(t^2)|| |2t| dt$, where the $|2t|$ comes from the computation of $||r(t^2)||$, since it's a composition of functions.

So now, all you have to do is to note that the second integral in 1 is the same as the second integral in 2, because it is the result of changing the variables.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
782
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K