garylau
- 70
- 3
stevendaryl said:We're trying to integrate
[itex]\frac{z-Ru}{(R^2 + z^2 - 2Rzu)^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/itex]
We can rewrite this as:
[itex]\frac{R}{(2Rz)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \frac{\frac{z}{R} - u}{(\frac{R^2 + z^2}{2Rz} - u)^\frac{3}{2}}[/itex]
Now [itex]\frac{\frac{z}{R} - u}{(\frac{R^2 + z^2}{2Rz} - u)^\frac{3}{2}}[/itex] is of the form
[itex](A-u)(C-u)^\alpha[/itex]
with [itex]A = \frac{z}{R}[/itex], [itex]C = \frac{R^2 + z^2}{2Rz}[/itex], [itex]\alpha = \frac{-3}{2}[/itex]
Here's the general way to integrate such expressions:
Rewrite this as:
[itex]((A-C) + (C-u))(C-u)^\alpha = (A-C) (C-u)^\alpha + (C-u)^{\alpha+1}[/itex]
We can easily integrate these terms, to get:
[itex]-\frac{A-C}{\alpha+1} (C-u)^{\alpha+1} - \frac{1}{\alpha+2} (C-u)^{\alpha+2}[/itex]
[itex]= -\frac{(C-u)^{\alpha+1}}{(\alpha+1)(\alpha+2)} ((A-C)(\alpha+2) + (C-u)(\alpha+1))[/itex]
[itex]= -\frac{(C-u)^{\alpha+1}}{(\alpha+1)(\alpha+2)} (A (\alpha+2) - C - u(\alpha+1))[/itex]
So if you plug in our known values for [itex]A, C, \alpha[/itex], you should get the desired result (after some simplification).
garylau said:where is this form
[itex](A-u)(C-u)^\alpha[/itex]
coming from
I suspect both of those relationships came from a book of integrals.garylau said:where is this form
[itex](A-u)(C-u)^\alpha[/itex]
coming from
and Where do you got [itex]((A-C) + (C-u))(C-u)^\alpha = (A-C) (C-u)^\alpha + (C-u)^{\alpha+1}[/itex] this equation from?
thank
garylau said:where is this form
[itex](A-u)(C-u)^\alpha[/itex]
coming from
...and Where do you got [itex]((A-C) + (C-u))(C-u)^\alpha = (A-C) (C-u)^\alpha + (C-u)^{\alpha+1}[/itex] this equation from?
Ye gads, is this not cheating? Would that actually work, and if so is it easier?Dragon27 said:But the temptation to integrate with respect to ##z## (since ##(z^2-Rzu)'=2(z-Ru)##), then integrate with respect to ##u##, and then differentiate with respect to ##z## is just irresistible...
It feels so good, that it probably is...Battlemage! said:Ye gads, is this not cheating?
The integrals in the intermediate steps are much easier, in my opinion (or, maybe, more obvious). In the end you just differentiate a simple fraction, it's not too hard.Battlemage! said:Would that actually work, and if so is it easier?