Very simple fraction simplification

  • Thread starter Thread starter smulc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the fraction (3p - 3q) / (5p - 5q), with participants exploring the reasoning behind the simplification process and the correct interpretation of factoring.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential to factor out (p - q) from both the numerator and denominator, questioning the implications of this step. There are attempts to clarify the use of the distributive law and the correct simplification process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on recognizing factors in the expression and correcting misconceptions about the simplification process. There is an acknowledgment of the confusion surrounding the initial steps taken by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption that p ≠ q to avoid the indeterminate form 0/0, which is central to the discussion of simplification.

smulc
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I feel stupid asking this, but I just can't see it. I need to simply this and I already know the answer, but I don't know why this is the answer.

simplify

3p-3q
5p-5q

My first reaction was to remove a factor of p-q but that would leave

p-q(3-3)
p-q(5-5)

Which would be 0/0. I know the answer is 3/5 but I just can't see why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can factor out p-q top and bottom, but your end result is not quite right. If you try to use the distributive law here, that is a(b+c) = ab + ac, this might help you see your error.
 
smulc said:
I feel stupid asking this, but I just can't see it. I need to simply this and I already know the answer, but I don't know why this is the answer.

simplify

3p-3q
5p-5q

My first reaction was to remove a factor of p-q but that would leave

p-q(3-3)
p-q(5-5)
The above is incorrect, and simplifies to 1, assuming p ≠ 0. This is based on what you wrote, which might not be what you intended.

The simplest way to go would be to notice that 3 is a factor of the terms in the numerator, and that 5 is a factor of the terms in the denominator. The original expression can be written like so:
$$ \frac {3(p - q)}{5(p - q)}$$
Of course, this can be simplified further.
smulc said:
Which would be 0/0. I know the answer is 3/5 but I just can't see why.
 
That makes perfect sense now. Thanks for explaining it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K