Can e^3 be converted to a logarithmic function with a value of 0.0498?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting the expression e^3 into a logarithmic form, specifically in relation to the value 0.0498. Participants explore the implications of logarithmic functions and their properties in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to convert the exponential expression into logarithmic form and question the validity of taking the natural logarithm of negative numbers. There is also confusion regarding the correct application of logarithmic properties and the interpretation of results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations and clarifications regarding logarithmic conversions. Some guidance has been offered, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of converting e^3 and e^-3, including the handling of logarithmic identities and the nature of the values involved. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations and assumptions.

shoook
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
1. Convert to logarithmic function: e^3=0.0498
3. ln(-3)=0.0166 is my guess
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you cannot take the ln of a negative number
 
okay well I was wrong, could it be ln(3)=0.0166?
 
where is .01666 coming from?
 
i divided 0.0498 by 3. that is totally wrong though.
 
shoook said:
i divided 0.0498 by 3. that is totally wrong though.
yes.

since it just asks you to convert to log form, just leave it

[tex]e^{3}=0.0498[/tex]

[tex]ln(e^{3})=ln(0.0498)[/tex]
 
okay if the equation was e^-3=0.0498 would I just rewrite it as:
ln(e^-3)=ln(0.0498) ? Also, does ln remain on the right side as well as the left?
 
no they cancel each other out, i was just showing you the operation; sorry for the confusion.

[tex]3=ln(0.0498)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Uh, you mean -3=ln(0.0498...), right?
 
  • #10
shoook said:
okay if the equation was e^-3=0.0498 would I just rewrite it as:
ln(e^-3)=ln(0.0498) ? Also, does ln remain on the right side as well as the left?
then it would be

[tex]-3=ln(0.0498)[/tex]
 
  • #11
Dick said:
Uh, you mean -3=ln(0.0498...), right?
that's his 2nd question
 
  • #12
Well, ok, however you want to handle it. But seeing stuff like 3=ln(0.0498) makes me nervous.
 
  • #13
Dick said:
Well, ok, however you want to handle it. But seeing stuff like 3=ln(0.0498) makes me nervous.
lol sorry!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K