Can Energy Be Converted to Mass?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of converting energy to mass, referencing Einstein's equation E=mc². Participants clarify that while mass can be converted to energy, energy itself has an inherent mass and does not need to be transformed into mass. They discuss how particle accelerators can create matter from energy, noting that energy and mass are interconnected properties rather than separate entities. The conversation also touches on the implications of energy changes in chemical reactions and the concept of effective mass in photons. Overall, the thread emphasizes the relationship between energy and mass, asserting that energy inherently possesses mass.
  • #31


Dadface said:
It was one of Einsteins favourite illustrations to state that an object when hot is more massive than the same object when cold.

but hot water is lighter than cold water...!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


hanii said:
but hot water is lighter than cold water...!

Are you confusing mass with density?
 
  • #33


Mass and energy are just metrics applied to systems; unlike Transformers they are not actual objects. E=mc^2 says that the energy in a system is equal to the mass of a system times the speed of light in a vacuum. This implies that adding energy to a system increases its mass; its 'rest mass' is the mass it has when it has no energy. Sometimes rest mass is created by particle accelerators or positron emission; because of the law of conversation of mass, it is assumed that the rest mass created is equal to the mass of the energy that is consumed by its creation.

The nuclear reactions inside stars cause them to emit cosmic rays including protons. Those protons (hydrogen nuclei) can be used as fuel for nuclear fusion. The fused nuclei (or just the protons emitted by stars) can drift into a forming star, becoming fuel for that star's nuclear reactions.
 
Last edited:
  • #34


Mass and energy are just metrics applied to systems; unlike Transformers they are not actual objects. E=mc^2 says that the energy in a system is equal to the mass of a system times the speed of light in a vacuum.

Mass is a fundamental property while energy is a description of the interaction of systems via work. While i agree that mass and energy themselves are not "objects", all objects have mass and energy.

The nuclear reactions inside stars cause them to emit cosmic rays including protons. Those protons (hydrogen nuclei) can be used as fuel for nuclear fusion. The fused nuclei (or just the protons emitted by stars) can drift into a forming star, becoming fuel for that star's nuclear reactions.

This is...kind of correct? The nuclear reactions inside stars release energy and neutrinos, but the reactions themselves do not release "cosmic rays" in the form of protons or electrons. The solor wind is composed of charged particles such as electrons and protons, but these are ejected from the outer atmosphere of the sun, not the core where the fusion is taking place. Also, the unused Hydrogen can indeed form other stars, and it is our current view that the Sun was created when a nebula, composed of hydrogen and other elements from previous stars, collapsed in on itself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K