B Can energy be decomposed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether energy can be decomposed, specifically in the context of a ball thrown at an angle on a horizontal plane. It establishes that kinetic energy is not fully converted into gravitational potential energy due to the horizontal component of velocity remaining unaffected by gravity. The calculations show that the change in kinetic energy corresponds to the change in gravitational potential energy, leading to a derived formula for height. Participants clarify that while energy itself is a scalar and cannot be broken into vector components, it can be associated with different components of motion. Ultimately, energy is conserved, but its forms can be analyzed through their respective components.
WuliDancer
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Force is a vector, so there is synthesis and decomposition of force; velocity is a, so there is synthesis and decomposition of velocity. Energy can be produced by doing work (F·S), and it can also be expressed as velocity (Ek=mV²). So can energy be decomposed?
Let's construct a model: a small ball with mass m is thrown on a horizontal plane with a V, and the direction of the velocity makes an angle θ with the horizontal plane. What is the maximum height it can reach? (ignoring air resistance) We that the kinetic energy of an object will not be completely converted into gravitational potential energy. The velocity in the horizontal direction will not be affected by any acceleration (the of acceleration is external force, and the object is not subjected to force in the horizontal direction when it is flying in the air). Therefore, it will not be converted gravitational potential energy. The amount of velocity in the vertical direction that can be converted into height depends on the velocity at the highest point - obviously 0, so the is completely converted into height.

Let's try:
Initial kinetic energy: E1=½mV²=½mV²sin²θ+½mV²cos²θ
You will find that sin²θ+cos²θ=1 seems to be a coincidence. Let's continue
Final kinetic energy: E2=½mV²cos²θ
Change in kinetic energy: δE=-½mV²sin²θ
The change in kinetic energy is exactly the opposite of change in gravitational potential energy, so
Change in gravitational potential energy: δE=½mV²sin²θ
δE=mgδh
Solution for δh=½V²sin²θ/g
Do you agree with this solution?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

WuliDancer said:
So can energy be decomposed?
Since it doesn't have components, it can not. Energy is a scalar quantity, not a vector: it has a magnitude but no direction.

WuliDancer said:
You will find that sin²θ+cos²θ=1 seems to be a coincidence
It is not a coincidence. You could consider it a consequence, though (divide Pythagoras ##a^2+ b^2 = c^2## by ##c^2##) :wink:

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and Orodruin
I think what you did is easier understood by writing the velocity as a vector, ##\vec{v}##. The kinetic energy is then ##\frac 12m\vec{v}\cdot\vec{v}## which you can expand as ##\frac 12m(v_x^2+v_y^2+v_z^2)##.

So you can't break energy down into components in the sense of a vector, but you can write an energy associated with each component of a vector and they will add to the total energy (as long as you work in an orthogonal basis, anyway). Since it's only ##v_z## that's changed by gravity, it's only the ##\frac 12mv_z^2## that changes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Gavran, Baluncore, jbriggs444 and 1 other person
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top