Deriving Kinetic Energy in a Double Pendulum System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on deriving the kinetic energy of a double pendulum system using Lagrangian mechanics, specifically in a scenario without a gravitational field. Participants explore the transformation of polar coordinates to Cartesian coordinates and the computation of time derivatives for velocity components to arrive at expressions for kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the setup of a double pendulum with two masses and angles, seeking to compute kinetic energy.
  • Another participant points out that the angles α and θ are functions of time, suggesting that this should be considered in the calculations.
  • There is a discussion about the lack of explicit time dependence in the initial equations presented, which leads to confusion regarding the derivatives.
  • A later reply provides a solution using the chain rule to derive the kinetic energy expressions, indicating that the anticipated results can be achieved through proper application of derivatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the initial approach to the problem, particularly regarding the treatment of time dependence in the angles. While one participant finds a solution, others have not reached a consensus on the methodology or the correctness of the initial assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made about the motion of the pendulums and the implications of not explicitly defining the time dependence of the angles. The discussion reflects a reliance on established equations of motion, which may not be fully applicable in the context of a double pendulum without gravity.

Andreas C
Messages
196
Reaction score
20
Ok, I'm reading up on Lagrangian mechanics, and there is a problem that I don't really understand: the double pendulum (in this case, without a gravitational field). So, I want to take it step by step to make sure I understand all of it.

We've got a pendulum (1) with a weight mass m=1kg attached to a rod of length r=1m making an angle of θ with the vertical, and another identical pendulum (2) attached on the weight of pendulum (1), making an angle α with it. Transforming these coordinates to Cartesian ones, we get x(1)=sinθ, y(1)=cosθ and x(2)=sinθ+sin(α+θ) and y(2) = cosθ+cos(α+θ).

Ok. So far so good. Now I am supposed to compute the time derivatives of the Cartesian velocity components in terms of the angles to compute the kinetic energy. How exactly am I supposed to do that? Since there is no t in these, I can't directly find their time derivatives, unless I use the equations that describe the motions of pendulums that are already known, but aren't these wrong in the case of a double pendulum?

I know that the results I am supposed to get for the kinetic energies are these:

T1=(dθdt)^2/2

T2=((dθdt)^2+(dθdt+dαdt)^2)/2+(dθdt)*(dθdt+dαdt)*cosα

I just have no idea how to get them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andreas C said:
Since there is no t in these
actually there is ##\alpha=\alpha(t),\quad \theta=\theta(t)##
Andreas C said:
with a weight mass m=1kg
this is not a good manner: you deprive yourself from opportunity of using the dimensions of physics quantities to check your formulas
 
Last edited:
wrobel said:
actually there is α=α(t),θ=θ(t)

What I meant was that it's not explicitly shown. Of course there is, but I don't know what the value of the function α(t) is.

wrobel said:
this is not a good manner: you deprive yourself from opportunity of using the dimensions of physics quantities to check your formulas

Well, I'm not the one who made the problem :)
 
Anyway, the question still stands, I still can't figure out what to do here.
 
Ok, I found the answer, here it is for anyone who might be interested:

Using the chain rule, we write say dx1/dt=sinθ as dθ/dt ⋅ d(sinθ)/dθ = dθ/dt ⋅ cosθ. If we plug this (and y1) into the equation for kinetic energy in this case (which is T1=(x^2+y^2)/2), and do some algebra, we eventually get the anticipated solution of T1=(dθ/dt)^2/2. It's the same thing for T2, only a bit more complicated. The point is that you're meant to apply the chain rule for derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K