Can f(x, t) be expressed as a function of x + ct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a differentiable function f: R^2 → R, satisfying the condition (df/dt) = c(df/dx) for a nonzero constant c, can be expressed as f(x, t) = h(x + ct) for some function h. The hint provided suggests using the change of variables (u, v) = (x, x + ct) to simplify the differentiation process. By applying the chain rule and manipulating the resulting equations, it is established that the function f does not depend on u, indicating that it is solely a function of v.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differentiable functions in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their applications
  • Basic concepts of differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the properties of differentiable functions in R^n
  • Learn about the implications of the condition (df/dt) = c(df/dx)
  • Investigate the derivation and applications of partial differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying multivariable calculus, and anyone interested in the applications of partial differential equations in theoretical contexts.

The1TL
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose f: R^2 --> R is differentiable and (df/dt) = c(df/dx) for some nonzero constant c.
Prove that f(x, t) = h(x + ct) for some function h.


Homework Equations



hint: use (u, v) = (x, x+ct)

The Attempt at a Solution



df/dt = limk-->0 (f(x, x+ct+k) - f(x, x+ct))/k
multiplying this by c gives:
limk-->0 (f(x, x+ct+ck) - f(x, x+ct))/k

I'm not sure where to go from here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you required to use the basic definition of the derivative? You were given a hint which works nicely with the chain rule but you have ignored it. If u= x, v= x+ ct, then \partial f/\partial x= (\partial f/\partial u)(\partial u/\partial x)+ (\partial f/\partial v)(\partial v/\partial x)= \partial f/\partial u+ \partial f/\partial v. Similarly, \partial f/\partial t= (\partial f/\partial u)(\partial u/\partial t)+ (\partial f/\partial v)(\partial v/\partial t)= c\partial f/\partial v.

Now, the original differential equation, in terms of u and v, becomes
c\partial f/\partial v= c(\partial f/\partial u+ \partial f/\partial v).

We can now subtract c\partial f/\partial v from both sides leaving c\partial f/\partial u= 0 which says that f does not depend upon u at all, it is simply a function of v.
 
Hi The1TL! :smile:

Can you calculate ##\frac d {du}f(x(u,v), t(u,v))## with partial derivatives?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K