Graduate Can falling factorials be a Schauder basis for formal power series?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of falling factorials as a potential Schauder basis for formal power series in the context of topological vector spaces. It is established that the set of falling factorials, denoted as ##\{(x)_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}##, does not serve as a Schauder basis for the space ##F[[x]]## under standard topology due to convergence issues when infinitely many coefficients are nonzero. The inquiry revolves around whether an alternative topology could be defined on ##F[[x]]## that would allow the falling factorials to function as a Schauder basis, emphasizing the distinction between normed and general topological vector spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of formal power series, specifically ##F[[x]]##
  • Familiarity with Schauder bases and their definitions in topological vector spaces
  • Knowledge of discrete topology and its implications on convergence
  • Basic concepts of convergence in the context of infinite series
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Schauder bases in general topological vector spaces
  • Explore alternative topologies on formal power series and their impact on convergence
  • Study the implications of discrete topology on vector spaces and convergence criteria
  • Investigate the relationship between norms and topologies in the context of vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in functional analysis, topology, and series convergence, will benefit from this discussion. It is also relevant for researchers exploring the foundations of vector space theory and its applications in analysis.

lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
We usually talk about ##F[[x]]##, the set of formal power series with coefficients in ##F##, as a topological ring. But we can also view it as a topological vector space over ##F## where ##F## is endowed with the discrete topology. And viewed in this way, ##\{x^n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}## is a Schauder basis for ##F[[x]]##.

Now in contrast, ##\{(x)_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}##, where ##(x)_n## denotes the falling factorial, is not a Schauder basis for ##F[[x]]##. That’s because if ##\Sigma_na_n(x)_n## never converges in the standard topology on ##F[[x]]## if infinitely many of the ##a_n##’s are nonzero. But my question is, does there exist some alternate topology on ##F[[x]]## which makes ##\{(x)_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}## a Schauder basis for ##F[[x]]## as a topological vector space over ##F## endowed with the discrete topology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A schauder basis per the wikipedia article is typically defined based on a norm, which I think means you don't get to pick any particular topology on the field. Do you only care about topologies defined by a norm on the vector space, or would any topology that happens to permit you to compute unique limits suffice?
 
Office_Shredder said:
A schauder basis per the wikipedia article is typically defined based on a norm, which I think means you don't get to pick any particular topology on the field. Do you only care about topologies defined by a norm on the vector space, or would any topology that happens to permit you to compute unique limits suffice?
I’m not interested in normed vector spaces at all. As Wikipedia says “Schauder bases can also be defined analogously in a general topological vector space.”
 
It feels like the answer has to be no, but it's tough. For example can you just define a topology where the sequence ##\sum_{i =0}^n a_i(x)_i## converges to ##\sum_{0}^{\infty} a_i x^i##? I poked around a little bit and can't generate an obvious contradiction where you just assume the normal topology on the polynomials and then pick some open sets around the infinite series that make those limits true.
 
As shown by this animation, the fibers of the Hopf fibration of the 3-sphere are circles (click on a point on the sphere to visualize the associated fiber). As far as I understand, they never intersect and their union is the 3-sphere itself. I'd be sure whether the circles in the animation are given by stereographic projection of the 3-sphere from a point, say the "equivalent" of the ##S^2## north-pole. Assuming the viewpoint of 3-sphere defined by its embedding in ##\mathbb C^2## as...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
11K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K