Can falling from a building be deadly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RilesKR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Falling
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Falling from a building can be deadly primarily due to the sudden stop upon impact, rather than the fall itself. The likelihood of fatality increases significantly from heights over 20 feet, with the manner of landing playing a crucial role in the outcome. Falling feet first may lead to survivable injuries such as broken bones, while landing on the head often results in severe trauma, including brain damage or neck fractures. Blunt force trauma to vital organs can also be fatal, emphasizing the importance of body position during a fall.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of physics related to free fall and impact forces
  • Knowledge of human anatomy and injury mechanisms
  • Familiarity with terms like blunt force trauma and survivability
  • Awareness of safety measures in high-risk activities like skydiving
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of free fall and terminal velocity
  • Study injury patterns associated with falls from various heights
  • Learn about safety techniques used in skydiving and parachuting
  • Investigate case studies of fall survivors and their injuries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for safety professionals, emergency responders, medical personnel, and individuals interested in understanding the risks associated with falls from heights.

RilesKR
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am unsure if this is the correct place to post. I apologize if it is not. This is not a homework question, but a question I have in general. I have tried searching for it on the web with no luck.

I remember learning in high school that when falling from a building, the fall many times is what kills the person. I cannot remember why and I am having a dispute with a friend regarding this. I understand there is a difference between falling and someone who chooses to jump. From what I read it seems when falling a person is not relaxed and there is greater stress. Am I anywhere close to being correct? Or should I concede defeat and admit that simply falling will not kill someone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF, RilesKR. It's a great place for learning.

Well, technically, it is the sudden stop at the end of the fall or jump that hurts or kills a person, not the fall itself. Skydivers jump all the time, but they have the parachute to soften the landing.

I think you are asking something about an on-purpose jump versus a fall, and the only difference I see is that with a fall, you have little control over how you land, so it's more likely that you will land on your head and break your neck. If you have control over your body position, and the height is not too great, you can land on your feet, putting mainly your legs and lower body at risk. But that is only a help up to a point -- from heights greater than a few meters, you are going to get badly hurt or killed no matter what.

Does that make sense?
 
A fall from a building will not necessarily cause death, but most often does if it's more than 20 feet or so. It depends on how one hits the ground.

Falling on one's head will cause brain damage by the impact or will result in one breaking the neck.

Falling feet first could result in broken feet, legs and pelvis, and perhaps arm(s) and back (rupture disc), but one could conceivably survive.

An impact of the body with something massive usually results in blunt force trauma to the soft tissue, i.e. organs and the circulatory system. Rupture of the aorta or major artery is usually fatal.

There have been cases of skydivers hitting the ground and surviving, but they require a huge amount of surgery and hospital time. It is also rare to survive.

I've hit the ground twice feet first after falling off a roof (from about 15 feet). It felt like a sledgehammer hitting one in the rear with the shock traveling up the spine and into the cranial cavity. Very unpleasant and painful.

I also fell sideways out of tree (from about 10 ft) and fortunately prevented a head first collision with the ground. Again it was very painful and I could certainly feel my lungs and internal organs trying to pull away from the chest and abdominal cavities. I was able to walk (actually crawl) away from that. I hope I don't repeat that experience.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K