Can High School Physics Explain Motion with Constant Acceleration and Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Signifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the principles of motion under constant acceleration and velocity in high school physics. The correct equation for an object's z-velocity with a constant upward acceleration (Az) is v = Az * t, where Az represents the net acceleration after accounting for gravity (g). Additionally, when an object travels straight up at a constant velocity (V0), its z-position is given by Z = V0 * t + Z0, without the 0.5gt² term, as this term applies only to scenarios involving acceleration, not constant velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Basic knowledge of forces and acceleration
  • Concept of gravitational force (g)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study kinematic equations for motion under constant acceleration
  • Explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in Newton's second law
  • Learn about the effects of drag on motion in physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of constant velocity and acceleration in engineering
USEFUL FOR

High school students studying physics, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in the fundamentals of classical mechanics.

Signifier
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Okay, this is high school physics I know but I still need to ask it.

Say I give something a constant acceleration A straight up into the air (A = [0,0,+Az]). If I ignore drag, then the object's z-velocity as a function of time with this constant acceleration will be

(Az - g)t

(where Az is the z-component of the acceleration) if the initial z-velocity at time t = 0 is 0. Am I correct?

Next question: say that an object is traveling straight up through the air with a constant velocity V0. Is the object's z-position as a function of time equal to

V0t - 0.5gt^2 + Z0

(where Z0 is the initial z position) or is it something else?

Sorry if I didn't word these questions right - I'm still very new to this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the object were traveling straight up at a constant velocity you wouldn't have the 0.5gt^2 term, this case would be equivilant to having Az=g in your previous example.
 
Signifier said:
Okay, this is high school physics I know but I still need to ask it.

Say I give something a constant acceleration A straight up into the air (A = [0,0,+Az]). If I ignore drag, then the object's z-velocity as a function of time with this constant acceleration will be

(Az - g)t

(where Az is the z-component of the acceleration) if the initial z-velocity at time t = 0 is 0. Am I correct?

No.

Don`t confuse forces with acceleration. It`s confusing when you say that you ''give something a constant acceleration Az''. If this is really what you mean, then you mean that you applied a force stronger than gravity in such a way that the net acceleration is Az (which I assume positive from your statement ''staright up in the air''). Then the velocity is Az t! Period!
An object has only one acceleration, given by the net force divided by the mass. One adds the forces *first* and then one finds the (unique) acceleration. One never adds acceleration. So if you say that you give an object an acceleration Az, it means you applied a force such that the combination of your force and of the force of gravity yields the acceleration Az. Then v = Az t.

Pat
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
924
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
994
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K