Can I add more than 2GB of RAM to a Gateway ml6720 laptop?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for upgrading the RAM in a Gateway ml6720 laptop beyond the manufacturer's stated limit of 2GB. Participants explore the implications of hardware and operating system limitations on RAM usage, as well as other factors that may contribute to the laptop's performance issues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the maximum usable RAM may depend on both the hardware and the operating system, suggesting that a 64-bit OS is necessary to utilize more than 2GB of RAM.
  • Others argue that performance issues may stem from factors other than RAM, such as the processor speed or the presence of pre-installed software that slows down the system.
  • One participant mentions that some computers may be limited to 2GB due to BIOS restrictions, although this is considered rare in modern machines.
  • There is a suggestion that a clean installation of the operating system could improve performance by removing unnecessary software.
  • Participants discuss the importance of ensuring that the RAM installed is compatible and of sufficient speed, with some questioning whether slower RAM could affect performance.
  • Several participants recommend antivirus software to check for potential malware that could be impacting system performance.
  • There is a mention of the need to manage startup programs to reduce system load and improve performance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the factors affecting the laptop's performance, with no clear consensus on whether upgrading RAM beyond 2GB is feasible or beneficial. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to improve the laptop's speed.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the uncertainty around the compatibility and performance of different RAM types, as well as the impact of the operating system and other hardware components on overall performance.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals experiencing performance issues with older laptops, particularly those considering hardware upgrades or troubleshooting slow systems.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
My girlfriend has a Gateway ml6720 for which support says that the max RAM it can handle is 2GB. I already gave it 2GB on an upgrade and it still runs slow. Has anyone had any experience in putting more than the supported amount of RAM in?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I was under the impression that the amount of usable RAM was dependent on not only the hardware you are using but also the operating system you are using.

I don't know what kind of computer that is, but either could be the limiting factor.

Also, there are other things that could be making it slow. What kind of RAM was it? Some RAM is faster than other RAM, so if you put in more, but it's a slower type, it could very well end up with little change.

Secondly, the bottleneck could be something else. It could be the processor.
 
You need a 64-bit OS such as the the 64-bit version of Vista to use more than 2GB RAM, it is not a "bug" or anything; it just has to do with the number of addresses you can access using 32 bits (2^32)
In addition to this some computers are limited to 2 GB because of their BIOS; although that is pretty rare on modern computers.

Also, 2GB should be enough for most tasks so if the computer is still slow RAM is not likely to be the limiting factor; many laptops e.g. use fairly slow harddrives which can make the computer feel really slow.
A clean install of whatever OS you are using can also help.
Finally, I assume you have already made sure that the problem is not atrojans or other type virus?
 
The computer has always been slow. It was relatively inexpensive, so I cannot imagine it was designed with high performance in mind. By clean install of OS do you mean a reinstall? I don't think that should be necessary as we have only had it a year and only 6 months ago we reset it to its factory settings.

I do not think it has a virus, but I do not know how to tell. We never activated Norton or Macafee or any of that other garbage.

Here's the product specs:

Picture2-10.png
 
Last edited:
Saladsamurai said:
I do not think it has a virus, but I do not know how to tell. We never activated Norton or Macafee or any of that other garbage.
Run, don't walk to the nearest Internet access point and download the free AVAST anti-virus, anti-trojan, etc software. It is free, and definitions are updated daily (or more frequently), and the core program seems to be updated at least once a month or so. It is a great package. I've been using it for a couple of years now, after NAV failed to rid my computer of some nasty hitch-hikers.

http://anti-virus-solution.com/avast2/indexicc.asp

As a musician, I often search for lyrics and or tabulature (to see how other people interpret songs that I play), and I swear that those sites are the most heavily contaminated with worms, trojans, etc. AVAST is powerful, and it is so up-to-date with it's threat definitions that I rarely have any problems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you running vista? Another 1Gb of RAM will help. Those are reasonable for running XP.
One reason for reinstalling windows is that most new machines come with a load of pre-installed junk - demo software, utilities etc, the manufacturer gets paid to put all this stuff on your machine. Do you have a dozen little system tray icons near the clock ?

Take a look at the tips here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/expert/northrup_restoreperf.mspx
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/window-on-windows/?p=157&tag=rbxccnbtr1

edit - to echo Danger's comment, you can also try http://www.spybot.com/ it scans you computer for viruses but doesn't run continually like avast or other av products.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
turbo-1 said:
Run, don't walk to the nearest Internet access point and download the free AVAST anti-virus, anti-trojan, etc software. It is free, and definitions are updated daily (or more frequently), and the core program seems to be updated at least once a month or so. It is a great package. I've been using it for a couple of years now, after NAV failed to rid my computer of some nasty hitch-hikers.

http://anti-virus-solution.com/avast2/indexicc.asp

As a musician, I often search for lyrics and or tabulature (to see how other people interpret songs that I play), and I swear that those sites are the most heavily contaminated with worms, trojans, etc. AVAST is powerful, and it is so up-to-date with it's threat definitions that I rarely have any problems.

Is this something that runs continuously or only when I run it? I do not use Norton or stuff like that because it just slows my computer down anyway... It's like paying for a virus.

mgb_phys said:
Are you running vista? Another 1Gb of RAM will help. Those are reasonable for running XP.
One reason for reinstalling windows is that most new machines come with a load of pre-installed junk - demo software, utilities etc, the manufacturer gets paid to put all this stuff on your machine. Do you have a dozen little system tray icons near the clock ?

Take a look at the tips here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/expert/northrup_restoreperf.mspx
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/window-on-windows/?p=157&tag=rbxccnbtr1

edit - to echo Danger's comment, you can also try http://www.spybot.com/ it scans you computer for viruses but doesn't run continually like avast or other av products.

I already upgraded to 2GB and yes I am running Vista. We cannot even notice the memory upgrade!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
avast runs all the time and checks each file when you open it - safer but you pay a performance penalty.
spybot does a scan when you tell it (avast does this when you first install aswell), so if not scanning there is no performance penalty, but you have to scan regularly if you indulge in unsafe computing ;-)

Those are pretty much the minimum specs for vista.
Make sure you have the latest drivers, especially for video.
Try turning off some of the eye-candy. Somewhere in display properties there is a setting for best performance/best appearance - try setting best performance.
Defrag the c drive.
Check how much junk is loading at startup.
Check the extra memory is being used, see control panel->system

Search on MS for vista performance tweaks.
 
mgb_phys said:
avast runs all the time and checks each file when you open it - safer but you pay a performance penalty.
spybot does a scan when you tell it (avast does this when you first install aswell), so if not scanning there is no performance penalty, but you have to scan regularly if you indulge in unsafe computing ;-)

Its my girlfriends, so it's pretty safe :smile:
mgb_phys said:
Those are pretty much the minimum specs for vista.
Make sure you have the latest drivers, especially for video.
How do I check this?

mgb_phys said:
Check how much junk is loading at startup.
And this?
Check the extra memory is being used, see control panel->system
[/QUOTE]

I did and it is. Could it be the kind of memory I bought? Is there reallt a such thing as slow memory and fast?

Thanks!
 
  • #10
The memory speed is limited by the 'fsb' number in the specs above - any ram that fits in your computer will manage at least this speed.

That was just to check that the ram was detected correctly by windows.
Another explanation is that the ram wasn't the bottle neck - although going from 1->2 gb on vista should help a lot.

Goto the laptop makers website and look for drivers in the support/downlaods section.

I think the most likely explanation is that you are loading masses of junk utils and demos at startup. checkout 'autoruns' on the MS website and the link I posted above.
 
  • #11
Okay thanks! Buy the way, I use a MacBook Pro and am about to upgrade myself. Do you know if Kingston is a good brand of memory?
 
  • #12
  • #13
Saladsamurai said:
Do you know if Kingston is a good brand of memory?
There are only a couple of plants producing ram and they supply all the makers. All the makers sell different grades based on the amount of testing they do. Kingston is fine.
I normally buy crucial, they have excellent support - eg. will replace for free if you selected the wrong type, and with free shipping they are ussualy as cheap as anyone else.
 
  • #14
1) As far as I know, 32-bit OSes including 32-bit Vista/XP allow you to utilise a little over 3GB of your memory, but definitely at least 2.75GB of it. My PC runs on 32-bit Vista and I have 4GB of memory on it; it shows "2.75GB" on the system information dialog, but my BIOS shows the full 4GB.

2) Yours is a chipset limitation; it has only 2 slots for your RAM and 2GB RAM DIMMs aren't compatible. So the maximum you can go is 2x1GB after all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
879
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K