Can I Answer O Level Qs without Showing Steps? - Cambridge O Level

  • Thread starter Thread starter hugoARD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cambridge
Click For Summary
In O Level examinations, it is generally acceptable to provide only the final answer without showing step-by-step solutions, unless the question specifically requests the working. However, including the working is considered good practice, as it can help secure partial credit if the final answer is incorrect but the method is correct. This habit is also beneficial for future academic pursuits, such as university, where marks may be awarded based on the working shown.
hugoARD
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is it okay to answer o level question without showing step by step solution? I just wrote some calculations how i found the answer. Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hugoARD said:
Is it okay to answer o level question without showing step by step solution? I just wrote some calculations how i found the answer. Please help
Without knowing the ins and outs of the syllabus, it is usually acceptable at that level to only give answers unless the question states otherwise (i.e. says show your working), however it is good practice to include it anyway, not least because if you get it wrong but have the correct method, you will only lose the mark awarded for the answer and not get zero for the whole question.
If you go to university then some lecturers will ONLY award marks where the student has working consistent with the final answer, so it's good to get in the habit.
 
Thank you for your answer. I feel relieved :)
 

Thread 'Pre-req for Ultrafast Optics? (Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics?)'

TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...
View full post »

Similar threads

O level student and I badly want to get into Cambridge
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Space Qualified Level Shifter Solutions for 1.5V I/O to 1.8V I/O?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Other Maintaining psychological energy levels
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Schools How to Navigate Applying to HEPTH PhD Programs in Europe vs. the US?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
861
Cambridge Gce A Level Past Papers z
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K
How's the Cambridge Tripos for undergrad Maths?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
Can I get into a BS Physics program at MIT?
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Can I get my formulas recognized by top math professors and universities?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Some questions on strange things in online courses
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Studying How Should I Study Quantum Mechanics and Which Math Should I Know?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K