Can I derive an equation for a vector field's divergence from its curl equation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of deriving an equation for a vector field from its curl equation, specifically when the divergence of the field is known to be zero at all points. The scope includes theoretical aspects and references to mathematical methods relevant to physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to derive an equation for the originating vector field from its curl equation.
  • Another participant suggests that solving partial differential equations is necessary, indicating the relationship between curl and divergence.
  • Some participants mention that there are expressions available for this derivation, referencing texts such as Boas and Arfken and Weber, as well as differential forms and Poincare's lemma.
  • A later reply seeks specific resources suitable for a high school student, expressing a desire for accessible materials.
  • Further recommendations include "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" by Mary Boas and "Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences" by Harley Flanders, with notes on their appropriateness for different educational levels.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the topic and the resources available, but there is no consensus on the specific derivation or the accessibility of the resources mentioned.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on mathematical maturity for understanding certain texts and the unresolved nature of whether the recommended resources specifically address the original question posed.

Savant13
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
Given an equation describing the curl of a vector field, is it possible to derive an equation for the originating vector field?

The divergence of the field is known to be zero at all points
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yea, you would have to solve partial differential equations:

[tex]\nabla \times \vec{F} = \vec{A}[/tex]

[tex]\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 0[/tex]
 
There *are* expressions for this. You might be able to find them in something like Boas or Arfken and Weber.

If you are familiar with differential forms, many (most? all?) proofs of the converse of Poincare's lemma also give the expressions that you want. See, e.g, Flanders.
 
weichi said:
There *are* expressions for this. You might be able to find them in something like Boas or Arfken and Weber.

If you are familiar with differential forms, many (most? all?) proofs of the converse of Poincare's lemma also give the expressions that you want. See, e.g, Flanders.

Where can I find this? I'm a high school student learning outside the classroom, so I don't have access to any resources that require subscription
 
More specific references:

"Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" by Mary Boas. This is an undergrad level book that is great for covering math required to do physics. It has lots of problems, *many* with answers in the back. I think the only critical prereq is calculus, which you must have. This book was a big help to me while preparing for grad school.

I don't know whether Boas actually covers the specific question you have, but it's still a good book to take a look at! You can learn *a lot* from it.

"Mathematical Methods for Physicists" by Arfken and Weber. Graduate-level, covers much more than Boas. Again, don't know whether it covers your specific question. This is almost certainly going to be too difficult for a high-school student, but if you ever decide that you are comfortable with the material in Boas, you might want to peek in this book.

"Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences", by Harley Flanders. I like this book, but it does require some "mathematical maturity". I wouldn't really recommend looking at this yet.

But ... lo and behold, it's on google books, and the relevant passage is on pg 28-32. In fact, the example on pg 30 is exactly what you want! In the language of forms, Flanders' A, B, and C on this page are the x, y, and z components of your expression for curl B.

If these pages from Flanders interest you, you might want to look at threads here on physicsforums that discuss forms. I'm sure they have references that are easier to learn from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K