Can I get a little help? (Factoring difference of 2 sqaures).

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of expressions involving the difference of squares, specifically focusing on the example of factoring \(x^6 - \frac{1}{64}\). Participants explore the method provided in a textbook and question its application in a specific example.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant cites the textbook method for factorization as \(x^n - c^n = (x^{\frac{n}{2}} - c^{\frac{n}{2}})(x^{\frac{n}{2}} + c^{\frac{n}{2}})\) and questions why the example does not follow this method correctly.
  • Another participant suggests that the expression should be rewritten as \(x^6 - \frac{1}{16} = (x^3)^2 - (\frac{1}{4})^2\) to clarify it as a difference of two squares.
  • Several participants confirm the calculation that \((\frac{1}{2})^6 = \frac{1}{64}\), emphasizing that the original claim regarding the factorization was based on a misprint in the book.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the factorization process and suggests that the book's example is incorrect, as expanding the proposed factors leads to a different expression than intended.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is an error in the textbook example, but there is no consensus on the correct application of the factorization method or the appropriate expression to use.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential misprints in the textbook and the need for careful application of factorization methods. There are unresolved questions regarding the correct interpretation of the factorization process.

Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
The book claims the method for the factorization is:

[tex]x^n - c^n = (x^\frac{n}{2} - c^\frac{n}{2})(x^\frac{n}{2} + c^\frac{n}{2})[/tex]

However, one example uses this:

[tex]x^6 - \frac{1}{64} = x^6 - (\frac{1}{2})^6 = (x^3 - \frac{1}{2})(x^3 + \frac{1}{2})[/tex]

My question is, why isn't 1/2 raised the 3rd power like the method tells you to do?

Any information would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
because it should be better written as

[tex]x^6 - \frac{1}{16} = (x^3)^2 - (\frac{1}{4})^2[/tex]
to show how exactly it is a difference of two squares.
 
Note that

[tex](\frac{1}{2})^6 = \frac{1}{64}[/tex]

and not 1/16.
 
James R said:
Note that

[tex](\frac{1}{2})^6 = \frac{1}{64}[/tex]

and not 1/16.

Thanks. I copied it wrong.
 
Holocene said:
The book claims the method for the factorization is:

[tex]x^n - c^n = (x^\frac{n}{2} - c^\frac{n}{2})(x^\frac{n}{2} + c^\frac{n}{2})[/tex]

However, one example uses this:

[tex]x^6 - \frac{1}{64} = x^6 - (\frac{1}{2})^6 = (x^3 - \frac{1}{2})(x^3 + \frac{1}{2})[/tex]

My question is, why isn't 1/2 raised the 3rd power like the method tells you to do?

Any information would be greatly appreciated!

Well, because the book misprinted it. :) You can easily expand all the terms on the RHS out to get:

[tex]\left( x ^ 3 - \frac{1}{2} \right) \times \left( x ^ 3 + \frac{1}{2} \right) = x ^ 6 - \frac{1}{4} \neq x ^ 6 - \frac{1}{64}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K