Can I Use Vector Notation for Graph Translations?

Click For Summary
Using vector notation for graph translations is mathematically valid, as it defines the movement in terms of direction and distance. Specifically, moving a graph can be expressed as adding a vector to the set of points that define the graph. However, while this notation is correct, it may not be well-received in a classroom setting, as traditional methods are often preferred by teachers. For clarity and to avoid potential conflict, it may be better to describe the translation in terms of the graph's vertex or its equation. Ultimately, understanding both methods can enhance comprehension of graph translations.
R_Sarav
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi. Its not really a problem but just a general question. When doing graph translations, such as move the parabola x units right or y units up etc, Is it okay to use vector format. So instead of saying move this equation 4 units left, could you write it like this -> <-4,0>

Homework Equations


I know this is used for translations of shapes but my main question is can it also be used for graphs

The Attempt at a Solution


I asked my teacher but he just shouted at me for asking him concepts he didnt talk about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R_Sarav said:

Homework Statement


Hi. Its not really a problem but just a general question. When doing graph translations, such as move the parabola x units right or y units up etc, Is it okay to use vector format. So instead of saying move this equation 4 units left, could you write it like this -> <-4,0>

Homework Equations


I know this is used for translations of shapes but my main question is can it also be used for graphs

The Attempt at a Solution


I asked my teacher but he just shouted at me for asking him concepts he didnt talk about.
A graph ##\mathcal{G}## of usually a function ##x \mapsto f(x)## is a set of points: ##\mathcal{G}=\{\,(x,f(x)\,|\,x \in \operatorname{domain}(f)\,\}##. This is a subset of ##\mathbb{R}^2## and to move it means to move it within this plane ##\mathbb{R}^2##. Thus you need a direction in which it is moved and a distance by which it is moved. But this exactly defines a vector ##v=(v_x,v_y)##. So the moved object will be ##v+\mathcal{G}=\{\,(x+v_x,f(x)+v_y)\,|\,x \in \operatorname{domain}(f)\,\}##. So in a sense this is even better than just to say move by ##"v_0"## in direction ##"x"## or ##"y"## since you allow more than two directions.

However, whether you should argue with your teacher is a complete different question. It's not always important to be right. Sometimes it's smarter not to be.
 
Last edited:
fresh_42 said:
A graph ##\mathcal{G}## of usually a function ##x \mapsto f(x)## is a set of points: ##\mathcal{G}=\{\,(x,f(x)\,|\,x \in \operatorname{domain}(f)\,\}##. This is a subset of ##\mathbb{R}^2## and to move it means to move it within this plane ##\mathbb{R}^2##. Thus you need a direction in which it is moved and a distance by which it is moved. But this exactly defines a vector ##v=(v_x,v_y)##. So the moved object will be ##v+\mathcal{G}=\{\,(x+v_x,f(x)+v_y\,|\,x \in \operatorname{domain}(f)\,\}##. So in a sense this is even better than just to say move by ##"v_0"## in direction ##"x"## or ##"y"## since you allow more than two directions.

However, whether you should argue with your teacher is a complete different question. It's not always important to be right. Sometimes it's smarter not to be.
So is it okay to write like this ? If i wrote like this In a paper would it be correct ?
 
R_Sarav said:
So is it okay to write like this ? If i wrote like this In a paper would it be correct ?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. That's why I wrote the formulas, which are correct. 4 to the left would be ##v_x=-4## and ##v_y=0##. It would be correct, if it would be o.k. depends on a lot of human factors. I wouldn't argue just to be right. 4 to the left is usually as good.
 
R_Sarav said:
So is it okay to write like this ? If i wrote like this In a paper would it be correct ?

It is correct, but I suspect that if you wrote it like fresh_42 did your teacher would really yell at you.

If I were your teacher, what I would prefer to see are either of the following (assuming you are graphing a parabola of the form ##y = a + b x^2##). If you want to move the whole graph ##A## units to the right (to the left if ##A < 0##) and ##B## units up (down if ##B < 0##), you could either say that (i) the vertex moves from ##(a,0)## to ##(a+A, 0+B)## but the shape remains unchanged; or (ii) explain that the new graph has equation ##y-B = a + b(x-A)^2 \Rightarrow y = a+B+b(x-A)^2.## Since you are plotting graphs in two-dimensional cartesian coordinate systems, I don't think you could be yelled at for doing it using method (i). However, my personal preference would be that you show your understanding by using method (ii).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
659
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K