Can indistinguishable particles obey Boltzmann statistics

In summary, textbooks claim that particles following Boltzmann statistics must be indistinguishable in order to ensure extensive entropy. However, a combinatorics derivation shows that both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can follow Boltzmann statistics, and that the Bose-Einstein distribution is only obtained for indistinguishable particles. Although textbooks argue that indistinguishable particles must follow Boltzmann statistics, there is evidence that this is not always the case, such as the use of the classical Drude model for conductors. The confusion may arise from the different interpretations of the terms "distinguishable" and "indistinguishable" when discussing identical particles.
  • #106
Philip Koeck said:
Are you beginning to see the problem? If C60 truly behaved like a boson you would be able to put any number of particles into the same state (or "point" in phase space). I find that really hard to imagine. I think they'll simply and very classically be in each others way, even considering the effects of uncertainty. To me it seems that quantum statistics simply doesn't apply to systems that are "too classical".
Bose-Einstein condensates of molecules exist. While no one has been able to cool molecule as big as C60 down to temperatures where BEC happens, there is no reason to think it doesn't make sense for many C60 molecules to be in the same quantum state.

By the way, double-slit type experiments have been performed using C60 (and even bigger molecules), and quantum effects are visible.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and Philip Koeck
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #107
DrClaude said:
Bose-Einstein condensates of molecules exist. While no one has been able to cool molecule as big as C60 down to temperatures where BEC happens, there is no reason to think it doesn't make sense for many C60 molecules to be in the same quantum state.

By the way, double-slit type experiments have been performed using C60 (and even bigger molecules), and quantum effects are visible.
Thanks. Experiments are always convincing. Maybe it is time to skip all classical statistics and start directly with quantum statistics as vanHees suggested earlier.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
  • #108
One more thing has turned up. It's been mentioned several times (also on Wikipedia and in textbooks) that the Boltzmann distribution is a high temperature and low occupancy limiting case of the BE and FD distributions. I can show that W approaches the correct Boltzmann counting for low occupancy as discussed in posts 69 to 73 (before calculating a distribution), but I'm having a hard time seeing how high T would help in general. Only if I insert expressions for the chemical potential and density of states that are valid for an ideal gas of indistinguishable particles into the BE or FD distribution, I get something that approaches the Boltzmann distribution for high T. Is the mentioned limiting case general or only valid for the ideal gas? Can anyone point me to some literature?
 
  • #109
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck

Similar threads

  • Thermodynamics
Replies
17
Views
933
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
807
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top