Can Integrating a Generalized Geometric Series Reveal New Insights into √π?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exploration of a generalized geometric series and its potential to reveal new insights into the mathematical expression for √π. Participants engage with the MacLaurin expansion of exp(-z²) and the implications of integrating term-by-term along the real line, focusing on the convergence and utility of the resulting series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes deriving a series expression for √π through the MacLaurin expansion of exp(-z²), noting that the individual term-wise integrals diverge and requiring a limit for evaluation.
  • Another participant corrects an integration error, presenting a revised expression for √π that involves a limit and a series summation.
  • Some participants mention the existence of a closed form solution in terms of the error function, questioning its usefulness and expressing disinterest in its triviality.
  • There is a suggestion that the original expression may be circular and ultimately leads to a dead end, prompting a search for a more meaningful result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the usefulness of the closed form solution involving the error function, with some finding it trivial while others acknowledge its existence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential for a more useful expression for √π.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the divergence of individual term-wise integrals and the dependence on the limit as R approaches infinity, which affects the convergence rate of the series.

alexfloo
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
I just sent some time dicking around with the MacLaurin expansion of exp(-z2) to derive a series expression for √π, by integrating term-by-term along the real line. I'm not really concerned with wether this is a useful or well-studied expression, I just thought it would be a fun exercise.

Since the individual term-wise integrals diverge, we have to stick with a limit. It came down to

\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{4}=\lim_{R\to\infty}\sqrt{R}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^nR^n}{(n-1)!}

As R increases, the rate of convergence of the series decreases, so this is pretty useless unless we have a closed form for that series.

There's an obvious form in terms of the error function, but does anyone know of one that would actually lead to a nontrivial result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correcting a very elementary integration error, I came up instead:

\sqrt\pi=\lim_{R\to\infty}2\sqrt{R}\sum_{n=0}^{∞} \frac{(-1)^n R^n}{n!(2n+1)}
 
As you noted, you can get a closed form solution in terms of the error function, which gives the answer as R becomes infinite. I am not sure what you are looking for.
 
Yeah, the reason I'm disinterested in that one is that using it gives:

\sqrt\pi = \lim_{R\to\infty} 2\sqrt R \frac{\sqrt\pi erf(R)}{2\sqrt R} = \sqrt\pi erf(\infty)=\sqrt\pi.

Basically it appears that my original expression was circular (i.e. trivial) in nature to begin with, but I was hoping to find a more useful expression. In any case, it seems like a dead end. Thanks anyways, though!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K