Can Inviscid Flows Be Rotational?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of inviscid flows and whether they can exhibit rotational characteristics, particularly in relation to vorticity. Participants explore the factors that might contribute to rotation in inviscid flows, contrasting them with viscous flows and examining the implications of these differences.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that viscous flows are always rotational due to shear stress, prompting questions about the rotational nature of inviscid flows.
  • One participant suggests that inviscid flows can indeed be rotational if they possess vorticity, referencing the ability to express flow equations in terms of vorticity.
  • Another participant questions what causes rotation in inviscid flows, noting the absence of shear stress and suggesting that pressure and weight forces alone cannot induce rotation.
  • A later reply emphasizes that any slight turning of the flow can result in vorticity, challenging the notion that rotation requires shear stress.
  • Some participants mention Helmholtz's third theorem and the use of point vortices in inviscid flow models to simulate vorticity, indicating a method to incorporate rotational effects.
  • One participant describes solid body rotation in fluid dynamics, attributing rotation to pressure gradients acting normal to streamlines, despite negligible viscous forces.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms that can lead to rotation in inviscid flows, with no consensus reached on whether inviscid flows can be rotational or what specifically causes such rotation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of modeling viscous phenomena with inviscid flow, indicating that the real-world behavior of fluids is often more complex than what inviscid models can capture.

jason.bourne
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
viscous flows are always rotational because of shear stress that is exerted on the fluid element due to viscosity.

what about the inviscid flows? can they be rotational ? if yes then what are the factors which makes the inviscid flows rotational?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
By rotational do you mean have vorticity? If so then yes, in fact the fundamental equations can be written in terms of vorticity rather than velocity by taking the curl of the equations.

[PLAIN said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorticity][/PLAIN]
For any flow, you can write the equations of the flow in terms of vorticity rather than velocity by simply taking the curl of the flow equations that are framed in terms of velocity (may have to apply the 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to do this rigorously). In such a case you get the vorticity transport equation which is as follows in the case of incompressible (i.e. low mach number) fluids, with conservative body forces

\frac{D\omega}{Dt} = \omega \cdot \nabla u + \nu \nabla^2 \omega
 
Last edited by a moderator:
okay fine but what is it that is making it to rotate?
like in viscous flows its the shear stress that causes the rotation of the fluid element.
 
Anything. Don't think of vorticity as a whirlpool in your bathtub; any time the flow turns even a little bit, it has vorticity.
 
viscous flows are always rotational because of the shear stress exerts a rotational moment about the center of the element .

what about the inviscid flows? what causes rotation in an inviscid flows?
shear stress is absent. The only forces acting on the fluid element are pressure force and weight. Weight acts through COG, pressure acts normal to the element surface, neither can cause rotation , then what is causing rotation in inviscid flows?

i don't think it can just rotate at its own wish. There has to be something right?
 
You may want to look up Helmholtz's third theorem.
 
When using inviscid flow, usually a point vortex is added to the model to simulate the vorticity present in an actual viscous flow (for example, the trailing edge of an airfoil). Vorticity is conserved in potential flow, so you have to introduce it somewhere in order for the flow to make sense in real problems. That sort of highlights the problem with potential flow; you can't fully model viscous phenomena with inviscid flow, and the real world is viscous.
 
Hey Jason,

I don't know know whether you've figured out your answer by now or not but I'll give you mine. This is a good question and here's how it works.

Consider solid body rotation of a fluid. Viscous forces are negligible but what causes the fluid particles to rotate is the pressure gradiant in the normal direction to the streamlines. There is no moment acting on the particles but each fluid particle rotates as it moves along the streamlines. I hope it makes sense if you need more help send me an email nikan4now@yahoo.com
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K