MHB Can Kolya Win at the Stone Pile Game?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zen1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game
Click For Summary
Kolya and Vitya are playing a game with 31 stones where players take turns dividing piles of stones until only single stones remain. The objective is to leave all piles with one stone after a player's turn. The discussion revolves around whether Kolya can guarantee a win regardless of Vitya's moves. Participants are analyzing the game's mathematical strategy by considering smaller numbers of stones to understand winning and losing positions. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards Kolya not being able to win every time due to the inherent complexities of the game.
zen1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
KOLYA AND VITYA PLAY THE FOLLOWING GAME. THERE IS A PILE OF 31 STONES ON THE TABLE. THE BOYS TAKE TURNS MAKING MOVES AND KOLYA BEGINS. IN ONE TURN A PLAYER DIVIDES EVERY PILE WHICH HAS MORE THAN ONE STONE INTO TWO LESSER ONES. THE PLAYER WHO AFTER HIS TURN LEAVES ALL PILES WITH ONLY ONE STONE IN EACH WINS. CAN KOLYA WIN NO MATTER HOW VITYA PLAYS?

I'm pretty sure that Kolya can't win every time but I'm a bit confused on the actual math behind it, would love some explanations. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zen said:
KOLYA AND VITYA PLAY THE FOLLOWING GAME. THERE IS A PILE OF 31 STONES ON THE TABLE. THE BOYS TAKE TURNS MAKING MOVES AND KOLYA BEGINS. IN ONE TURN A PLAYER DIVIDES EVERY PILE WHICH HAS MORE THAN ONE STONE INTO TWO LESSER ONES. THE PLAYER WHO AFTER HIS TURN LEAVES ALL PILES WITH ONLY ONE STONE IN EACH WINS. CAN KOLYA WIN NO MATTER HOW VITYA PLAYS?

I'm pretty sure that Kolya can't win every time but I'm a bit confused on the actual math behind it, would love some explanations. Thanks!

Hi zen! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

Let's work back from the end.
Suppose there is only 1 stone, who will win?
What with 2 stones? And 3?

Now it becomes more interesting.
Suppose we have 4 stones, to win, we need a move that will bring us to a state that is guaranteed to lose.
Is that possible? (Wondering)
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K