Deeviant
- 285
- 0
h8ter, are you sure your parents gave you permission to be on the interenet?
h8ter said:Ok, the Standard can NOT say that new theories are falsified through contradictory evidence. Where did you get that from?
Yes, I agree with you that the Standard Model does contradict with many devaiting theories. But it does not give reason to rule them out as wrong.
New theories can not be compared with the Standard Model. I'm sure you'll agree with me that you can not use one thing to prove a totally different thing wrong. It's like saying my birthday isn't the real birthday, because yours is on a different day.
Experiments really don't mean anything. Oh, wow, the Standard Model is backed up by experiments that agree with observational data...ITS A THEORY! Sure, whatever, Tom.
Tom:
Incorrect. As I said above, you can not use the Standard Model in contradiction with proposed theories to rule them out as wrong. Nothing is falsified just because it does not go in accordance with the Standard Model.
Wrong. Experimental data is not what makes a theory concrete.
You can not compare experimental data either, because it relies on the theory itself. Which is just like comparing theories. So, yea.![]()