Can Matter Enter a Black Hole Intact? Debate & Advice

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MikeeMiracle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on whether matter can enter a black hole intact, specifically examining the effects of spaghetification and the conditions near the event horizon versus the singularity. Participants explore theoretical implications and interpretations related to black holes, gravitational forces, and the behavior of matter in extreme conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that spaghetification occurs near the singularity, while others contend it can happen near the event horizon, particularly for smaller black holes.
  • One participant suggests that for larger black holes, the gravitational gradient outside the event horizon is less severe, allowing for the possibility of crossing the event horizon intact.
  • Another participant mentions that the radiation environment outside most black holes would be harmful regardless of spaghetification effects.
  • There is a claim that the event horizon is an abstract surface that may not be easily detectable when crossed, especially for large black holes.
  • One participant challenges the idea that objects are pulled into the event horizon at or near the speed of light, arguing that in a local frame, the event horizon passes through at the speed of light without implying that objects themselves travel at that speed.
  • There is a disagreement about the implications of escape velocity and the structural integrity of matter as it approaches a black hole.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effects of spaghetification and the conditions under which matter can cross the event horizon. The discussion remains unresolved, with differing interpretations of gravitational effects and the behavior of matter near black holes.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions of spaghetification and the characteristics of black holes, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also highlights the complexity of gravitational effects and the conditions under which they operate.

MikeeMiracle
Messages
396
Reaction score
313
TL;DR
Can anything enter a black hole intact
I am having a debate with someone who appears knowledgeable about black holes from the language he is using but we have a disagreement about if matter can enter a black hole. He is trying to tell me the gravitational gradient near the event horizon is such that spaghetification occurs as you approach the event horizon. I am debating that the spaghetification effect occurs near the singularity itself, not the event horizon.

I came to this understanding from reading posts on this forum that spaghetification will occur outside the event horizon for small black hole but for larger black holes the gravitational gradient outside the event horizon is not so great and that it would be possible for a human to cross the event horizon intact and alive.

I may have misinterpreted what I have been reading on here but can anyone offer some advise as to which one of us was correct.

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
Tell your friend to stick to cooking spaghetti, as he knows nothing about physics!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, berkeman, topsquark and 3 others
You are correct. You could search for the "ouch radius" at PF for some details.

Note that the radiation environment outside most black holes would fry you anyway...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and russ_watters
MikeeMiracle said:
I am debating that the spaghetification effect occurs near the singularity itself, not the event horizon.
You are correct. For a small enough hole, "close enough to the singularity" for spaghettification turns out to be at or around the horizon; but as the hole gets larger the "spaghettification point" moves further and further inside the horizon.

A simple heuristic to see the behavior is that the spacetime curvature of a black hole, which has to get sufficiently large for things like spaghettification to occur, is proportional to ##M / r^3##, where ##M## is the mass of the hole. Since at the horizon, ##r = 2M##, the spacetime curvature at the horizon is proportional to ##M / (2M)^3 = 1 / 8 M^2##, i.e., it gets smaller as ##M## gets larger.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Your friend is wrong. For a sufficiently large black hole - not only would you be able to cross the event horizon without deleterious effects on your personage - but it is so abstract a surface that you would have trouble detecting that you had crossed it at all - you'd have to calculate the location of the event horizon (using mass and distance measurements) to conclude you were passing through it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Thank you for the responses. He seemed to be obsessing over the escape velocity at the event horizon being the speed of light to which I was responding that just because the escape velocity is the speed of light that does not mean you need to travel at the speed of light to fall into a black hole which kicked off this debate. His response was:

"What I stated is that no positive mass density object can even reach a black hole. And what I further stated is that objects are attracted and/or pulled into the event horizon at or near the speed of light. And due to being drawn into a higher rate of acceleration, they disintegrate because there is a limit to what compounds can do to support their constituent structural integrity at a molecular and atomic level before they just fail. It is also called nuclear decay. So you are not trying to travel at the speed of light [which is impossible], you are being drawn into the gravitational current that is racing at the speed of light."

The above to me seems like he is not taking into account the IRF of the falling object and instead looking at the falling object as an observer to reach that conclusion.

As ever I am greatful to have this forum as a resource to cross check my understanding.
 
MikeeMiracle said:
What I stated is that no positive mass density object can even reach a black hole.
Wrong.
MikeeMiracle said:
And what I further stated is that objects are attracted and/or pulled into the event horizon at or near the speed of light.
No. In any local frame the event horizon passes through you at the speed of light. This does not give any meaning to the notion that you pass through the event horizon at the speed of light.

The rest seems to be nonsense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeterDonis, PeroK and DaveC426913

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K