Can n-spheres have temporal components in their metric tensor?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter space-time
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of incorporating temporal components into the metric tensor of n-spheres, particularly focusing on the 4-sphere and 3-sphere. Participants explore the implications of adding a temporal dimension to the metric and how it relates to existing models in both curved and flat spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant derived the metric tensor for the 4-sphere using 5D spherical coordinates and questioned the validity of applying a temporal component to n-spheres.
  • Another participant challenged the initial claim about the metric of the 4-sphere, suggesting it resembles the Minkowski metric in spherical coordinates.
  • A participant indicated that while it is possible to apply a temporal component to an n-sphere, the resulting metric would describe a different geometry than the surface of the n-sphere unless a suitable coordinate transformation is found.
  • A follow-up question was posed about whether a modified metric tensor for the 3-sphere, incorporating a temporal component, could describe spherically curved spacetime.
  • Another participant confirmed that the proposed metric would describe a spacetime where the spatial component forms a 3-sphere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the metric tensors for n-spheres and the implications of adding temporal components. There is no consensus on whether the proposed modifications accurately represent the geometry of n-spheres.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions and transformations necessary to validate the proposed metrics. The discussion also highlights the complexity of relating different coordinate systems and their respective metrics.

space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
I just recently derived the metric tensor of the 4-sphere by embedding the coordinate system within 5D spherical coordinates, deriving the tangential vectors and then doing the dot product with all of the tangential vectors except for the er vector since r stays constant. I then added a sign signature to this 4-sphere metric tensor which I chose to be (- + + +).

Then a crucial memory hit me. A long time ago, back when I first learned how to derive metric tensors, I remember looking up the metric tensor for 3D spherical coordinates online. When I did this, a page with the metric tensor for spherical coordinates in Minkowski space came up. This particular metric tensor looked like this:

g00 = -1
g11 = 1
g22= r2
and g33= r2sin2(θ)

Every other term was 0.

Now I know that this particular space-time is flat while the 4-sphere that I recently derived is curved, but the Minkowski spherical metric tensor above is not even the same as the metric tensor for 4D spherical coordinates (the coordinate system you use when deriving the 3-sphere).

Since this Minkowski version of spherical coordinates was different from the metric tensor for 4D spherical polar coordinates, this made me wonder whether or not you can actually apply a temporal component to n-spheres.

Can someone please tell me if it is valid to apply a sign signature to an n-sphere (indicating that n-spheres can have temporal components) or if the metric tensors of n-spheres can only be purely spatial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you sure that's the metric of the 4-sphere? this looks like Minkowski metric in spherical coords.

[itex]ds^{2} = g_{ab} dx^{a} dx^{b}= dt^{2} - dr^2 - r^2 d \theta^2 - r^2 sin^2 \theta d \phi^2[/itex]

Also what do you mean by applying a component to n-sphere? or temporal component?
Also what do you mean by "Minkowski version of spherical coordinates ... for 4D spherical polar coordinates"?
 
Last edited:
space-time said:
Can someone please tell me if it is valid to apply a sign signature to an n-sphere (indicating that n-spheres can have temporal components) or if the metric tensors of n-spheres can only be purely spatial?

You can, but the resulting metric will describe a different geometry than the surface of an n-sphere in space (unless, of course, you can find a coordinate transformation under which the metric components transform into that new form - and you cannot).
 
Nugatory said:
You can, but the resulting metric will describe a different geometry than the surface of an n-sphere in space (unless, of course, you can find a coordinate transformation under which the metric components transform into that new form - and you cannot).

Ok. Now I have another question. If I derive the metric tensor for the 3-sphere instead and then put an extra row and column within the matrix for a -1 (as is done with the Minkowski version of 3D spherical coordinates), then will that particular metric describe the 3D surface of a 4D sphere with the 4th dimension being time (or in other words, spherically curved space time)? Here is what I am talking about:

g00= -1
g11=r2sin2(ø)sin2(ψ)
g22=r2sin2(ψ)
g33=r2

As for my coordinate labels:
x0=t (my temporal component)
x1
x2
x3

All other elements are 0. You may notice that I simply added a negative 1 element to the matrix that would have otherwise simply been the 3-sphere (just as the Minkowski version of spherical coordinates just adds a -1 to what would otherwise just be 3D spherical polar coordinates).

This is what I meant when I asked: Would the metric tensor above describe spherically curved space time?
 
ChrisVer said:
are you sure that's the metric of the 4-sphere? this looks like Minkowski metric in spherical coords.

[itex]ds^{2} = g_{ab} dx^{a} dx^{b}= dt^{2} - dr^2 - r^2 d \theta^2 - r^2 sin^2 \theta d \phi^2[/itex]

Also what do you mean by applying a component to n-sphere? or temporal component?
Also what do you mean by "Minkowski version of spherical coordinates ... for 4D spherical polar coordinates"?

It is the Minkowski metric of spherical coordinates. I did not actually post my 4-sphere metric.
 
Yes. Such a metric would describe a spacetime where the space would form a 3Sphere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K