MHB Can Odd Positive Integers Solve the Equation $\cos kx = 2^{k-1} \cos x$?

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $k$ be an odd positive integer. Solve the equation $\cos kx=2^{k-1} \cos x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\[k = 1: x\in \mathbb{R}\\\\ k = 3: cos(3x)=4cos(x) \Rightarrow cos^3(x)-3cos(x)sin^2(x)=4cos(x)\\\\\Rightarrow cos^3(x)=\frac{7}{4}cos(x) \\\]
- which only has the trivial solution: $cos(x)=0,\;\; i.e. \;\;x =\frac{\pi }{2}+p\pi,\;\;p\in \mathbb{Z}$
\[k = 5,7,9 ...: cos(kx)=2^{k-3}cos(3x)=2^{k-3}4cos(x)\]
So I end up with the same solution as for $k =3$.

I guess there are other (better) ways to solve the equation. Maybe one could use the inequality:
\[\left | \frac{cos(kx)}{kcos(x)} \right |\leq 1\]
- to show that the only non-trivial solution ($cos(x)\neq 0$) appears for $k=1$

Another way could be to define the function:
\[f(x)=cos(kx)-2^{k-1}cos(x), \;\; k = 3,5,7 ...\]
I would look at the set: $S = \left \{ x\in\mathbb{R}|f(x)=0 \right \}$

Now, $f'(x)=-ksin(kx)+2^{k-1}sin(x)$ so there is at least one inflection point between $0$ and $\pi$

But $f''(x)=-k^2cos(kx)+2^{k-1}cos(x)=(1-k^2)cos(kx)$ for $x\in S$

$f’’(x)=0$ is only possible if $k = 1$ or $x=\frac{\pi}{2}\in S$ and due to periodicity $S = \left \{x|x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} \right \}$

Thankyou for any corrections to the above considerations!
 
Your answer is correct, well done, lfdahl!

The calculus method that you showed is great, I think, because I don't really go through them, (I have a little headache today:o)...but your proposed method suggests an easier way to approach the problem as I see if:

$\left| \frac{cos(kx)}{kcos(x)} \right|\le 1$ we have $\left| kcos(x) \right|\ge \left| cos(kx) \right|$ but since $\cos kx =2^{k-1} \cos x$ and $k>0$, we get

$k \left| cos(x) \right|\ge 2^{k-1}\left| \cos x \right|$

This is like asking what $k$ will it hold so that $k \ge 2^{k-1}$ and obviously that inequality is true iff $k=1$.

And the result follows where we have $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $.
 
anemone said:
Your answer is correct, well done, lfdahl!

The calculus method that you showed is great, I think, because I don't really go through them, (I have a little headache today:o)...but your proposed method suggests an easier way to approach the problem as I see if:

$\left| \frac{cos(kx)}{kcos(x)} \right|\le 1$ we have $\left| kcos(x) \right|\ge \left| cos(kx) \right|$ but since $\cos kx =2^{k-1} \cos x$ and $k>0$, we get

$k \left| cos(x) \right|\ge 2^{k-1}\left| \cos x \right|$

This is like asking what $k$ will it hold so that $k \ge 2^{k-1}$ and obviously that inequality is true iff $k=1$.

And the result follows where we have $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $.

I see 2 cases

1) k = 1 for which is it is identity

or 2) cos kx =0 and cos x =0 or which $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $
 
kaliprasad said:
I see 2 cases

1) k = 1 for which is it is identity

or 2) cos kx =0 and cos x =0 or which $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $

Oh My...yes, you are right and thanks for correcting my silly conclusion to say that the inequality is true only when $k=1$. I appreciate it!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top