MHB Can Odd Positive Integers Solve the Equation $\cos kx = 2^{k-1} \cos x$?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation $\cos kx = 2^{k-1} \cos x$ for odd positive integers k. Participants express appreciation for a calculus method proposed by lfdahl, noting its effectiveness in simplifying the problem. There is acknowledgment of a misunderstanding regarding the inequality's validity, which is corrected to apply beyond just k=1. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematical discussions. Overall, the thread emphasizes finding efficient methods for tackling complex equations.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $k$ be an odd positive integer. Solve the equation $\cos kx=2^{k-1} \cos x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\[k = 1: x\in \mathbb{R}\\\\ k = 3: cos(3x)=4cos(x) \Rightarrow cos^3(x)-3cos(x)sin^2(x)=4cos(x)\\\\\Rightarrow cos^3(x)=\frac{7}{4}cos(x) \\\]
- which only has the trivial solution: $cos(x)=0,\;\; i.e. \;\;x =\frac{\pi }{2}+p\pi,\;\;p\in \mathbb{Z}$
\[k = 5,7,9 ...: cos(kx)=2^{k-3}cos(3x)=2^{k-3}4cos(x)\]
So I end up with the same solution as for $k =3$.

I guess there are other (better) ways to solve the equation. Maybe one could use the inequality:
\[\left | \frac{cos(kx)}{kcos(x)} \right |\leq 1\]
- to show that the only non-trivial solution ($cos(x)\neq 0$) appears for $k=1$

Another way could be to define the function:
\[f(x)=cos(kx)-2^{k-1}cos(x), \;\; k = 3,5,7 ...\]
I would look at the set: $S = \left \{ x\in\mathbb{R}|f(x)=0 \right \}$

Now, $f'(x)=-ksin(kx)+2^{k-1}sin(x)$ so there is at least one inflection point between $0$ and $\pi$

But $f''(x)=-k^2cos(kx)+2^{k-1}cos(x)=(1-k^2)cos(kx)$ for $x\in S$

$f’’(x)=0$ is only possible if $k = 1$ or $x=\frac{\pi}{2}\in S$ and due to periodicity $S = \left \{x|x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} \right \}$

Thankyou for any corrections to the above considerations!
 
Your answer is correct, well done, lfdahl!

The calculus method that you showed is great, I think, because I don't really go through them, (I have a little headache today:o)...but your proposed method suggests an easier way to approach the problem as I see if:

$\left| \frac{cos(kx)}{kcos(x)} \right|\le 1$ we have $\left| kcos(x) \right|\ge \left| cos(kx) \right|$ but since $\cos kx =2^{k-1} \cos x$ and $k>0$, we get

$k \left| cos(x) \right|\ge 2^{k-1}\left| \cos x \right|$

This is like asking what $k$ will it hold so that $k \ge 2^{k-1}$ and obviously that inequality is true iff $k=1$.

And the result follows where we have $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $.
 
anemone said:
Your answer is correct, well done, lfdahl!

The calculus method that you showed is great, I think, because I don't really go through them, (I have a little headache today:o)...but your proposed method suggests an easier way to approach the problem as I see if:

$\left| \frac{cos(kx)}{kcos(x)} \right|\le 1$ we have $\left| kcos(x) \right|\ge \left| cos(kx) \right|$ but since $\cos kx =2^{k-1} \cos x$ and $k>0$, we get

$k \left| cos(x) \right|\ge 2^{k-1}\left| \cos x \right|$

This is like asking what $k$ will it hold so that $k \ge 2^{k-1}$ and obviously that inequality is true iff $k=1$.

And the result follows where we have $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $.

I see 2 cases

1) k = 1 for which is it is identity

or 2) cos kx =0 and cos x =0 or which $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $
 
kaliprasad said:
I see 2 cases

1) k = 1 for which is it is identity

or 2) cos kx =0 and cos x =0 or which $x=\frac{\pi}{2}+p\pi, p\in\mathbb{Z} $

Oh My...yes, you are right and thanks for correcting my silly conclusion to say that the inequality is true only when $k=1$. I appreciate it!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top