Can QT estimate the ionization energy of neutral Helium, He I?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the estimation of ionization energy for neutral Helium (He I) using quantum theory (QT) and its comparison with experimental methods. Participants clarify that ionization energy is defined as the energy required to remove the outermost electron, which is often the highest energy electron, and discuss the use of perturbation theory and the Hartree-Fock approximation for calculations. Experimental determination of ionization energy is achieved through photoionization experiments at synchrotron sources, utilizing UV light to ionize gaseous atoms. The conversation highlights the complexities of calculating ionization energies for heavier elements and the necessity of accounting for correlation effects in multi-electron systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum Theory (QT) fundamentals
  • Perturbation Theory in quantum mechanics
  • Hartree-Fock approximation
  • Photoionization techniques and synchrotron radiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Hartree-Fock method for multi-electron systems
  • Explore perturbation theory applications in quantum mechanics
  • Study experimental techniques for measuring ionization energy, particularly photoionization
  • Investigate the effects of electron correlation in quantum calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemists, and researchers involved in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on atomic structure and ionization processes.

  • #31
Sean Torrebadel said:
I'll accept that probability theories have their place, but I refuse to accept that the foundation of my structural being is structured with such uncertainty.

Still you are born because of a totally random egg-activation,
and you had about 50% probability of being structurally a male or a female.

From the rest of you comments on QM, I can also conclude that your training in this field was a bit chaotic ...
... and this influenced considerably (structurally) your way of thinking.

If you just considered all experimental data, your conclusion would be certainly different.
Experimental data would reduce any uncertainty in your understanding of physics.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K