Undergrad Can Quantum Effects Prevent Reaching Absolute Zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical limits of temperature, specifically regarding absolute zero and the role of quantum effects. It is established that while absolute zero (0 Kelvin) cannot be reached through thermodynamic means, temperatures can approach it asymptotically. The conversation references the conditions within supermassive black holes, which can reach temperatures as low as 10^-14 Kelvin, but emphasizes that these temperatures are influenced by external factors such as cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) at 2.7 K. The consensus is that there is no definitive minimum temperature due to quantum effects, but practical challenges arise as one approaches absolute zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics and its laws
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of black hole physics and Hawking radiation
  • Concept of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole thermodynamics
  • Explore quantum mechanics and its effects on temperature limits
  • Investigate the relationship between temperature and energy removal techniques
  • Study the cosmic microwave background radiation and its impact on cosmic structures
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students interested in thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and black hole research will benefit from this discussion.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,762
Reaction score
248
TL;DR
Do quantum effects as well as thermodynamic laws forbid zero Kelvin? Is there a non-zero greatest lower bound?
In https://phys.org/news/2016-09-cold-black-holes.html it is stated that a supermassive black hole interior could be 10^-14 degrees Kelvin. Is there a limit, perhaps due to quantum effects, below which a temperature (in a black hole or elsewhere) can go? Or do the possibilities approach 0 asymptotically, with only 0 being the theoretical minimum?

Putting it slightly differently: Usually the laws of thermodynamics are invoked to forbid absolute zero; in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero, it is stated that one cannot reach absolute zero by thermodynamic means. Are there other means besides thermodynamic that could subtract energy, or are there quantum effects that would forbid it as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nomadreid said:
In https://phys.org/news/2016-09-cold-black-holes.html it is stated that a supermassive black hole interior could be 10^-14 degrees Kelvin.
This would be true (assuming our current beliefs about Hawking radiation are correct) if the hole was alone in the universe, but it's not. In our actual universe, the hole would be, even if no other matter fell in, continually absorbing CMBR radiation at 2.7 K, so (a) its mass would be increasing, not decreasing, and (b) the Hawking temperature is not a good description of its actual conditions.

As usual, phys.org does not bother to mention all of the relevant items.

nomadreid said:
Is there a limit, perhaps due to quantum effects, below which a temperature (in a black hole or elsewhere) can go? Or do the possibilities approach 0 asymptotically, with only 0 being the theoretical minimum?
As far as I know, theoretically, there is no minimum and absolute zero can in principle be approached asymptotically. The practical issue is that the colder something is, the harder it gets to remove any more heat from it, with the difficulty increasing without bound as absolute zero is approached. I don't know of any quantum effects that change that.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid and vanhees71
Thanks for the very helpful reply, PeterDonis.
 
nomadreid said:
Thanks for the very helpful reply, PeterDonis.
You're welcome!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K