I Can Quantum Effects Prevent Reaching Absolute Zero?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores whether quantum effects impose a limit on how low temperatures can go, particularly in the context of black holes. It references a claim that supermassive black holes could reach temperatures as low as 10^-14 degrees Kelvin, while also noting that they would continuously absorb cosmic microwave background radiation, complicating this scenario. The consensus is that absolute zero cannot be reached thermodynamically, and while temperatures can approach zero asymptotically, practical challenges arise as one nears absolute zero. No significant quantum effects were identified that would alter this understanding. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of temperature limits in extreme environments like black holes.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,754
Reaction score
243
TL;DR
Do quantum effects as well as thermodynamic laws forbid zero Kelvin? Is there a non-zero greatest lower bound?
In https://phys.org/news/2016-09-cold-black-holes.html it is stated that a supermassive black hole interior could be 10^-14 degrees Kelvin. Is there a limit, perhaps due to quantum effects, below which a temperature (in a black hole or elsewhere) can go? Or do the possibilities approach 0 asymptotically, with only 0 being the theoretical minimum?

Putting it slightly differently: Usually the laws of thermodynamics are invoked to forbid absolute zero; in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero, it is stated that one cannot reach absolute zero by thermodynamic means. Are there other means besides thermodynamic that could subtract energy, or are there quantum effects that would forbid it as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nomadreid said:
In https://phys.org/news/2016-09-cold-black-holes.html it is stated that a supermassive black hole interior could be 10^-14 degrees Kelvin.
This would be true (assuming our current beliefs about Hawking radiation are correct) if the hole was alone in the universe, but it's not. In our actual universe, the hole would be, even if no other matter fell in, continually absorbing CMBR radiation at 2.7 K, so (a) its mass would be increasing, not decreasing, and (b) the Hawking temperature is not a good description of its actual conditions.

As usual, phys.org does not bother to mention all of the relevant items.

nomadreid said:
Is there a limit, perhaps due to quantum effects, below which a temperature (in a black hole or elsewhere) can go? Or do the possibilities approach 0 asymptotically, with only 0 being the theoretical minimum?
As far as I know, theoretically, there is no minimum and absolute zero can in principle be approached asymptotically. The practical issue is that the colder something is, the harder it gets to remove any more heat from it, with the difficulty increasing without bound as absolute zero is approached. I don't know of any quantum effects that change that.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid and vanhees71
Thanks for the very helpful reply, PeterDonis.
 
nomadreid said:
Thanks for the very helpful reply, PeterDonis.
You're welcome!
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...