Can Relativistic Speeds Affect the Calculation of a System's Center of Mass?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that it is indeed possible to define a precise center of mass for a system of point-masses moving at relativistic speeds. By selecting a point z and a spacelike hyperplane S, one can compute total linear and angular momenta, resulting in tensor fields P^a(z,n) and S_{ab}(z,n). The center-of-mass is characterized by a unique worldline where the mass dipole moment vanishes for an observer with zero 3-momentum. This definition aligns with Newtonian principles but incorporates additional complexities inherent to relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) and Special Relativity (SR)
  • Familiarity with tensor calculus and momentum conservation
  • Knowledge of spacelike and timelike vectors
  • Concept of geodesics in relativistic physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of tensor fields in General Relativity
  • Explore the implications of simultaneity in Special Relativity
  • Learn about the properties of geodesics in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the relationship between mass dipole moments and center of mass in relativistic systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of relativity who are interested in the dynamics of systems at relativistic speeds and the implications for center of mass calculations.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
34
Consider a system of several point-masses separated by large distances and moving with relativistic speeds in relation to one another. GR says that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light. SR says that simultaneity often does not exist for such point-masses. Question: Is it possible to define a precise (although dynamic) center of mass for such a system? As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, such definitions exist. Pick a point z and a spacelike hyperplane S passing through that point. Let it be normal to a timelike vector n. Then define total linear and angular momenta by summing up individual particle momenta as they intersect S. This gives you tensor fields [itex]P^a(z,n)[/itex] and [itex]S_{ab}(z,n) = S_{[ab]}[/itex].

There are now two nontrivial points to note. First, given any point z, there exists exactly one (up to normalization and sign) normal vector [itex]\bar{n}^a(z)[/itex] such that
[tex] P^a(z,\bar{n}(z)) \propto \bar{n}^a(z) .<br /> [/itex]<br /> Second, there exists a unique worldline described by all possible z's satisfying<br /> [itex] P^a(z,\bar{n}) S_{ab} (z, \bar{n}) = 0.[/itex]<br /> This is the center-of-mass. For normal matter, it is timelike and has other nice properties. In the absence of any radiation or external forces, the center-of-mass moves on a geodesic (straight line) in SR. Furthermore, the angular momentum tensor is parallel-transported along that geodesic. These results follows from energy and momentum conservation.<br /> <br /> In words, the definition I've given states that the center-of-mass is where the system's mass dipole moment vanishes as viewed by an observer seeing zero 3-momentum. This is similar to what's done in Newtonian physics, although there are a number of additional subtleties that have to be considered in the relativistic case.[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
10K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K