Can Singularities Enable Constant Faster-Than-Light Travel?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of faster-than-light (FTL) travel using singularity-based methods, particularly focusing on the theoretical use of wormholes for constant travel. Participants explore various ideas and approaches related to this speculative topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests the basic concept of using a wormhole for FTL travel, indicating a desire to explore designs and drawings related to this idea.
  • Another participant introduces the notion of a "worm hole opening engine ship" (WHOES) and mentions personal implications of this concept extending into the future.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the appropriateness of the discussion, questioning its relevance given the speculative nature of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the viability or appropriateness of discussing FTL travel using singularities, with some expressing skepticism about the topic's relevance.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is limited by its speculative nature and the acknowledgment that the concepts presented are not grounded in current scientific reality.

star.torturer
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
i don't know where to put this so feel free to move it:

I wolud like to discuss ways of Faster than light transport using singularity based forms. (not in reality, only good ways of doing it)

thers always the basic one of:

ship> }-----------worm hole----------{

but what about constant travel using wormholes, i will desighn some drawings explaining what i mean.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I um errr uhhhh...yeah...whew...sighhhhh..
 
I invented the WHOES years ago (worm hole opening engined ship) now i have families to support in 2050, 2090, 3060,and 4000, it is not all fun you know.
 
I guess I should have put it somewhere more sensible then.
 
star.torturer said:
I guess I should have put it somewhere more sensible then.
This really isn't going to go anywhere, as you already said, "not in reality". This post really isn't appropriate anywhere on this forum.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K