rhody said:
Ok, you still need, "the identfier of at least one iPhone 4S" to be able to use the knowledge gained in the discovery process to communicate.
What does this buy you, short term, long term ? Ball in your court. How about a few creative words this time, jh ?
Rhody...
Just thought the way the implementation of the communication infrastructure was interesting. I'd love to see what kind of machine learning they're (probably) using to improve the speech recognition. I find it really interesting that they send raw audio data...I wonder what the overhead on that is.
On to the topic at hand, I could see Siri replacing Google for iPhone users, but, unless they open it up to a larger range of platforms than the iPhone 4S, they won't get Google. I'm not sure whether the speech format would transfer over to a desktop/laptop medium, either.
So, it really comes down to whether Apple will open up Siri, or even possibly release an API. (I've never programmed for an Apple device, but from what I've heard their APIs are really good.) These days, Apple is not as much of a computer company as much as it is a consumer device company, with most revenue from iPhone, iPod, and iPad. On one end, you could make the argument that keeping Siri limited to the iPhone would provide product differentiation, but I don't think that's enough to get everyone to rush in and pick up an iPhone 4S. That's probably what Apple will do, though. But if they really want adoption of it to take off, they'll open it up.
Of course, they'll need to find some way to monetize it, so look forwards to getting advertisements through Siri...