Can Slow Space Travel Overcome the Speed Barrier in Vacuum Flight?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of developing a vehicle capable of flying in a vacuum without traditional rocket propulsion. Key points include the necessity of achieving sufficient velocity to overcome gravitational forces and atmospheric drag when launching from Earth. The conversation highlights solar sails as a potential solution, noting their lack of onboard propellant but also their low acceleration, which results in extended travel times. The importance of thrust efficiency, specific impulse, and the effects of radiation exposure on manned flights are also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket propulsion principles
  • Familiarity with solar sail technology
  • Knowledge of specific impulse and thrust efficiency
  • Awareness of radiation effects in space travel
NEXT STEPS
  • Research solar sail design and its applications in space missions
  • Explore advanced propulsion technologies beyond traditional rockets
  • Study the effects of microgravity and radiation on human physiology during long-duration space flights
  • Investigate the physics of momentum transfer from photons in vacuum environments
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, space mission planners, and researchers interested in alternative propulsion methods for space travel.

spacecadet11
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello. Thanks for previous responses. I asked a question about developing a vehicle that 'flies' in a vacumn instead of a rocket. Apparently the issue with space travel is the required speed. Not distance traveled per se above the Earth's surface or the fact that the vehicle has to travel thru a vacumn...per se.

I might have further questions in the future.
Bye
SC
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
spacecadet11 said:
Hello. Thanks for previous responses. I asked a question about developing a vehicle that 'flies' in a vacumn instead of a rocket. Apparently the issue with space travel is the required speed. Not distance traveled per se above the Earth's surface or the fact that the vehicle has to travel thru a vacumn...per se.

I might have further questions in the future.
Bye
SC

So you are talking about a solar sail?
 
spacecadet11 said:
Hello. Thanks for previous responses. I asked a question about developing a vehicle that 'flies' in a vacumn instead of a rocket. Apparently the issue with space travel is the required speed. Not distance traveled per se above the Earth's surface or the fact that the vehicle has to travel thru a vacumn...per se.
The bolded statement is a bit confusing. A vehicle in space usually requires propulsion (from a rocket) unless it has enough velocity to coast to it's destination.

For spacecraft from the Earth's surface to orbit, the rocket must provide sufficient thrust to overcome gravity (weight of the vehicle) and drag in the atmosphere while providing accelertion to orbital velocity - assuming that one wishes to achieve orbit. Then it is a matter of climbing the rest of the way out of Earth's 'gravity well', and then getting up to a velocity to travel to some other destination.

Time to destination is an issue for manned flights because of the deleterious effects of radiation exposure and 0-gravity. The time is a function of distance and velocity, and the achieve velocity is dependent on the acceleration, which is dependent on the thrust and mass of the craft (including expendable propellant). Thrust efficiency is expressed as specific impulse and ultimate that is dependent on the propulsive technology and specific energy, kJ/kg (or specific power, kW/kg) of the propuslive and power generation systems.

Solar sails or the like are attractive since no on-board propellant is necessary, but the acceleration is so low, that is takes a long time to get going. The momentum imparted from photons or solar particles is rather low. The pressure from the solar wind is on the order of 1 nPa.

Ref: http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SWN/sw_dials.html
http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ace_mission.html#summary
http://web.mit.edu/space/www/helio.review/axford.suess.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K