Can Solar Energy Reduce High Electricity Costs in California's Central Valley?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Solar energy can significantly reduce high electricity costs in California's Central Valley, particularly for households exceeding PG&E's "300% over baseline" tier, which charges $0.40/kWh. Installing a small solar system can provide a quick return on investment by supplementing grid power. Key considerations include local solar energy data, installation costs per kW, and the efficiency of existing home insulation and air conditioning systems. Utilizing government incentives and financing options can further enhance the feasibility of solar installations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PG&E's tiered electricity pricing structure
  • Familiarity with solar energy systems, including photovoltaic (PV) panels
  • Knowledge of local solar energy data sources, such as NREL's NSRDB
  • Awareness of government incentives for solar installations in California
NEXT STEPS
  • Research local solar energy production data using NREL's NSRDB
  • Investigate installation costs and potential savings for a 2kW solar system
  • Explore government programs and private financing options for solar panel installation
  • Learn about the benefits of thermal panels for heating water as an alternative to PV panels
USEFUL FOR

Homeowners in California's Central Valley, energy efficiency advocates, and anyone considering solar energy solutions to reduce high electricity costs.

  • #91
Bararontok said:
3.) 1.5W Low Pressure Sodium Lamps (can last a whole year even if on for 24 hours a day):

Ivan Seeking said:
I need a link to the suggested lights. I don't see anything online that agrees with the information you've posted.

Bararontok said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminous_efficacy#Examples
1. ^ "LED or Neon? A scientific comparison". http://www.signweb.com/index.php/channel/12/id/138/.
2. ^ "Why is lightning coloured? (gas excitations)". http://webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/4.html.
3. ^ a b c d e f Philips Product Catalog (German)
http://www.lighting.philips.com/de_de/tools_downloads/pricelist_lamps/downloads/preisliste_dede_20081023.pdf

I'm asking for a direct link to a sales page for 1.5 watt low-pressure sodium lamp for the home.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #92
I agree that reactive power puts an extra burden on the power lines. And there are some additional I2R losses, however, we don't pay for this directly [in the US], so it isn't a way to save money, and it isn't as simple as you suggest. For example, if we live next door to each other, the reactive power from your appliances could be coupled to that from my appliances, with little reactive load seen at the local transformer.

Just FYI: In the industrial arena, we sometimes consider this in order to balance sections of a plant by reversing phase on similar machines. In this way the reactive power from two systems can cancel out. Note that these are typically three-phase systems. Industry is charged for reactive power. We also consider the higher harmonics, usually resulting from high-power switched-mode systems, which can become signficant mainly due to the total harmonic distortion produced.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K