I Can somebody explain me this? Planck's Law in action

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matthias_Rost
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    wtf
Matthias_Rost
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
When you calculate a plasma with 1.000.000 K then you get according to planck's formula a plasma, which emits x-Ray / Gamma-Radiation in a quite deadly intensity. Can somebody explain all this ultra-high temperatures posted in all the fusion experiments?
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength.
Please check for logarithmic scaling.
As you can see, there are 4 curves.
Blue AM 0 as measured
yellow Planck for 5777 K
green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion
red Planck for 1.000.000 K

To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in fusion reactors, we would, according to Planck, already been dead.

nuclear fusion.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Matthias_Rost said:
TL;DR: When you calculate a plasma with 1.000.000 K then you get according to planck's formula a plasma, which emits x-Ray / Gamma-Radiation in a quite deadly intensity. Can somebody explain all this ultra-high temperatures posted in all the fusion experiments?
Interesting question- one I had not thought of.

First, confined plasmas have a variety of radiation emission mechanisms, not just blackbody but also synchrotron and "bremsstrahlung". There are also emitted neutrons in addition to photons. I did find a brief summary of the safety measures in "Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design":

"The MFR technological and biological radiation protection is performed by a combination of the blanket and special structural components.
In addition to fusion energy utilisation and tritium breeding, the blanket provides a considerable attenuation of the plasma radiation flux. Physical protection components that absorb neutrons and gamma radiation from nuclear reactions in structural materials are located behind the blanket. Behind the radiation shielding, the parameters of the irradiation effect (particularly onto the magnet materials) must not exceed the following specified limits:
• total absorbed dose for insulators: not higher than 5 × 107Gy,
• nuclear reaction thermal power absorbed by a superconductor: within 10 kW,
• fast neutron fluence on superconducting coil: within 1019n/cm2.
The shielding material should contain light elements acting as neutron moderators and elements with large atomic numbers absorbing the gamma radiation. The well-reputed heterogeneous iron-and-water medium is generally used for this purpose. Where a thin shielding is necessary, an advanced material based on, for example, zirconium hydride can be used.

In the DEMO and FPP projects, the blanket + shielding thickness is close to 1 m. It is the key component in the gap between the plasma and the TF coil. Approximately 2-m-thick concrete bioshield is used to protect personnel."

Interesting stuff!
 
Yeah sure, quite interesting. I met some guys online, who worked at I guess Korean fusion Laboratory. And they said: "We suppress thermal radiation." And I said: "how?". No answer.

See, the main problem in understanding this is sure there are many types of radiation of an ultra hot plasma, when it's rotating in an accelerator. Formally, synchrotron radiation is one kind of decellaration-radiation or called "bremsstrahlung". And yeah, 1 m lead can absorb many of the radiation. But that's not the point. I think there's a misconception. See the Energy, with which they pump the reactor, is one thing. But the true temperature they reach, so the thermal energy is something different. Since thermal energy is defined by Maxwell-Boltzmann-Distribution. And therefore it accounts only relative movement of particles and not aligned movement of particles together in a circle.

So when you now equate the magnetic pumping energy with the kinetic energy derived from Maxwell-Boltzmann, you get quite high temperatures. E_magn = E_kin = 3/2 k_b*T. Truth is, that the relative movement in a plasma of particles, which have a velocity of nearly 1/3 of c in a magnetic field, which is nearly homogenous is almost zero.

That's why I don't believe all these published high Temperature values, unless somebody posts a serious temperature measurement. Doesn't have to be a protocol. But as far as I know after 5000 K every material is at least molten. So the only way to measure the surface temperature of an ultra hot plasma would be optical, like you do at the sun. And how such a spectrum should look according to Planck, I plotted as the red curve.

And I still don't get how to be able to suppress thermal radiation. I mean, this would contradict the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Since, Planck is a quite complex derivative of this fundamental law. So I don't get these guys at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Measuring the temperatures of bright (visible spectrum) cosmic objects would use spectral analysis. But temperatures of IR (warm / hot) radiators is done using Stefan's Law with radiometric cameras. There seems no reason why suitable filters couldn't be used to find the black body temperature using the ratio of two measured intensities after the fashion of colour TV cameras. Why? Could it be to do with the actual size of IR filters to mount on a two channel image sensor array? I'm sure there...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
18K
Replies
23
Views
12K