Can someone be too old or too late for physics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pablotano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neuroscience Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether individuals can be considered "too old" or "too late" to pursue a career in physics. Participants share personal experiences and perspectives on age in relation to success in the field, exploring themes of motivation, recognition, and the nature of scientific progress.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about starting physics at 20, feeling it may be too late to make significant contributions compared to younger peers.
  • Another participant asserts that it is never too late to pursue physics, sharing their own late start in learning the subject.
  • Some participants question the emphasis on Nobel Prizes as a benchmark for success in science, arguing that significant contributions come from many individuals, not just a few laureates.
  • References are made to historical figures in science to illustrate that major breakthroughs are often built on the work of many lesser-known contributors.
  • A participant mentions Richard Feynman's perspective on recognition, emphasizing a love for problem-solving over accolades.
  • There is a note that similar discussions about age and success in physics occur frequently in the forum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of age in pursuing physics, with some advocating that it is never too late, while others reflect on societal perceptions of precocity and success. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of age on contributions to the field.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference personal experiences and societal norms regarding age in education, which may not be universally applicable. The discussion highlights varying benchmarks for success and recognition in scientific fields.

pablotano
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can someone be "too old" or "too late" for physics?

I am a first year physics student, but I am 20 years old (pretty old for my country, average starting age is 18), because I started after leaving med school, which I find extremely jailed in "memorization walls", with no place for analytical problem solving, something that I have loved all my life. I started to love physics because I was introduced to neuroscience, which lead me to information theory, probability analisis, mathematics and physics.
I decided to study physics not only because I practically become obsessed with any problem I encourage, but also because I find physics to be the only "real" foundation of the understanting of nature, thanks to its mathematical basis.
Well, now the problem is that I constantly see that most physicists that discover great things all started very very young, which is not my case. So, besides I am really good at math (the first of my class), I am periodically dissapointed about the fact that I am maybe too old to make a difference, and this sometimes brings me back to think if I made the right decision when I left med school.

The thread here is about sharing information about cases of physicists that did great discoveries without being extremely precocious or "geniuses" since they were kids. Also your opinion about this kind of situation would be of real help.

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bigQ said:
It is never too late to do anything. Even I've started learning physics too late. Try some online learning resources. And yeah try this http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/theorist.html

Well, this was one of the places where I read that "if you want to earn a Nobel Prize blah blah blah, you should start studying before you are supposed to", besides, I Am already in university studying physics. Anyway, thank you very much for the resource!
 
Why is a Nobel Prize everyone's benchmark for useful work? I don't understand that mentality at all. Nobel Laureates represent the very apex of scientific research/innovation (plus a bit of politics and such). That's like saying that all NBA players in the 1990's should have retired because Michael Jordan was the best. Science is not done by a handful of brilliant people who revolutionize the world in an instant of epiphany, despite what the lay press, historical texts etc show. It is a slow and arduous process where the major breakthroughs, attributed to a single person or small group, are built on a solid foundation of work done by people who the majority of the world will never hear of.

Every heard of Charles Darwin? How about Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Lyell, James Hutton or Thomas Malthus?
 
Yanick said:
Why is a Nobel Prize everyone's benchmark for useful work? I don't understand that mentality at all. Nobel Laureates represent the very apex of scientific research/innovation (plus a bit of politics and such). That's like saying that all NBA players in the 1990's should have retired because Michael Jordan was the best. Science is not done by a handful of brilliant people who revolutionize the world in an instant of epiphany, despite what the lay press, historical texts etc show. It is a slow and arduous process where the major breakthroughs, attributed to a single person or small group, are built on a solid foundation of work done by people who the majority of the world will never hear of.

Every heard of Charles Darwin? How about Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Lyell, James Hutton or Thomas Malthus?

I think just like you, in an enteview, Feynman said that he did not want any kind of honours, especially the Nobel Prze, he just loved to solve problems and discover answers, and if any, he just like the kind of recognition that arises when you see other scientists working with your work as their base.
 
We have identical threads on this topic once a week.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K