Can someone explain fractional calculus?

Click For Summary
Fractional calculus extends traditional calculus by allowing derivatives and integrals to be taken to non-integer orders, such as the 0.5th derivative. This concept raises questions about its practical applications, as traditional derivatives represent rates of change like velocity. Despite initial skepticism regarding its utility, fractional calculus has applications in fields such as acoustics, quantum mechanics, fluid flow, and diffusion. The discussion highlights the mathematical curiosity surrounding fractional derivatives and their graphical representation, which offers a continuum between functions and their derivatives. Overall, fractional calculus represents a fascinating area of study with potential implications in various scientific domains.
jack476
Messages
327
Reaction score
125
So, apparently, it's possible to generalize integration and derivation into non-integer orders. For instance, it's apparently possible to take the 0.5th derivative of a function.

What I'm wondering is what would be represented by such an equation? If a derivative represents how a function changes over time, like velocity and acceleration, what on Earth would you do with the fractional derivative?

Here's the Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus) just to make clear I'm not confusing it with partial derivatives, which by this point I'm well acquainted with :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A very interesting article, I had never heard of fractional calculus before. I look at this as mathematicians investigating an area for their own curiosity not that it applied to anything practical. The graphics show how varying the fractional power gets you curves between the function and its derivative which is cool in and of itself. They even describe using complex powers also pretty cool.

At the very end of the article, the author outlines the uses in acoustics, quantum mechanics, fluid flow and diffusion all valid applications. Now I'm going to have ask around about it at work. Thanks.
 
jedishrfu said:
A very interesting article, I had never heard of fractional calculus before. I look at this as mathematicians investigating an area for their own curiosity not that it applied to anything practical. The graphics show how varying the fractional power gets you curves between the function and its derivative which is cool in and of itself. They even describe using complex powers also pretty cool.

At the very end of the article, the author outlines the uses in acoustics, quantum mechanics, fluid flow and diffusion all valid applications. Now I'm going to have ask around about it at work. Thanks.

You're quite welcome. After you've asked your coworkers could you please let me know what they had to say (since from the sound of it you work around a lot of math people)? I tried reading the article but it seems to be well above my understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
jack476 said:
You're quite welcome. After you've asked your coworkers could you please let me know what they had to say (since from the sound of it you work around a lot of math people)? I tried reading the article but it seems to be well above my understanding.

Mine too.
 
One of the professors at my school has this as a main part of her research (looking at her publications, it appears frequently in the form of fractional differential equations). I've never done much reading into it, and it's well beyond my knowledge as well, but the example in the Wiki article of the monomial x^k is at least quite simple to follow. It looks like they noted the general pattern for the nth derivative (natural n) of x^k, which involves factorials, and then changed the domain of this pattern to the reals by replacing factorials with the gamma function, and shows that it satisfies the desired properties of the idea of an rth derivative.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K